2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of fiber orientation and structural-integrity reinforcement on the flexural behavior of elevated slabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above-described models are currently used within the analytical design procedure of FRC two-way slabs. However, the recent studies revealed that the implementation of those could be complemented by the introduction of structural redistribution factor 51,52 and/or orientation factor [53][54][55] in order to ensure the more accurate evaluation of the structural response in flexure. The magnitude of the former (up to 1.4) depends on the redistribution capacity of the studied element, whereas the latter takes into account the orientation of fibers which, in turn, is influenced by the rheological properties of concrete, casting method, and the geometry of the element in question.…”
Section: Flexural Strength Of Hrc: Sectional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-described models are currently used within the analytical design procedure of FRC two-way slabs. However, the recent studies revealed that the implementation of those could be complemented by the introduction of structural redistribution factor 51,52 and/or orientation factor [53][54][55] in order to ensure the more accurate evaluation of the structural response in flexure. The magnitude of the former (up to 1.4) depends on the redistribution capacity of the studied element, whereas the latter takes into account the orientation of fibers which, in turn, is influenced by the rheological properties of concrete, casting method, and the geometry of the element in question.…”
Section: Flexural Strength Of Hrc: Sectional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] However, several studies evidenced that the use of the constitutive models obtained from small-scale characterization beams might have led to inaccurate and unsafe design for SFRC slabs. 1,7,25,26 One of the main reasons behind this phenomenon is a more favorable fiber orientation along the main (longitudinal) direction of the small-scale beams in comparison with large-scale structures. [26][27][28][29][30] In this regard, the fib Model Code 2010 22 and Annex L to the new Eurocode 2 31 propose an orientation factor (K, in accordance with Clause 5.6.7 of the fib Model Code 2010 22 ) that reduces/ increases the serviceability and ultimate residual tensile strength of the FRC element once unfavorable/favorable fiber orientation is experimentally verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been suggested also in the new generation of Eurocodes, which includes a new annex (Annex L) explicitly devoted to the design of SFRC structural elements. 4 Although some studies are available in the literature on the constitutive relationship of the material, [5][6][7][8][9][10] on the structural behavior of elevated slabs and beams, [11][12][13][14][15][16] and on their design approach, [17][18][19] the present work aims to shed some new lights through a comprehensive experimental campaign on SFRC beams and slabs, with or without ordinary reinforcement. Special attention is devoted to the reliability of building codes requirements to predict both the load-bearing capacity and the behavior in service conditions, with the aim of comparing the ductility supplied by high dosages of steel fibers, or low dosages used in combination with conventional reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%