2019
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2018-0338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of field technique, density, and sex on home range and overlap of the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi)

Abstract: Home range is shaped by an individual’s interactions with the environment and conspecifics, and both size and placement may vary in response to population fluctuations. The method used to collect locational data may also affect home-range estimates. We examined the effect of density, sex, and field method on home range of southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi (Vigors, 1830)) inhabiting eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrière) forests. Twelve mark–recapture grids were used to census M. gapperi from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data did not reveal sex differences in space use as shown for many other bird species (e.g. Aronsson et al 2016, Johansson et al 2018, Tisell et al 2019). For instance, male King Rails used more space during the non-breeding season than females (Kolts and McRae 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Our data did not reveal sex differences in space use as shown for many other bird species (e.g. Aronsson et al 2016, Johansson et al 2018, Tisell et al 2019). For instance, male King Rails used more space during the non-breeding season than females (Kolts and McRae 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Differential habitat selection by individuals for the highest quality areas available can be observed in individual home ranges [5,6]. An individual's home range is often defined by multiple abiotic and biotic features of the environment and can shift based on the dynamic characteristics of these features and an individual's physiological requirements [7][8][9]. Which resources an individual selects within its home range can therefore provide valuable information about species-specific behavior and ecological relationships [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The These associations may represent the areas where fungal sporocarps were foraged from since M. gapperi and N. insignis commonly consumed ECM and AM sporocarps respectively. The relatively small size of the patch cuts (0.4 ha) likely allowed these species to consume sporocarps in the forest and move them into the cuts during activities within their home range, the average size of which is between 0.4 and nearly 4 ha (Tisell et al, 2019). Interestingly, both open habitat associates (M. pennsylvanicus and Z. hudsonius) consumed AM fungi but were almost never captured in the forest, suggesting that they may be foraging sporocarps inside the cut.…”
Section: Microhabitat Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%