2020
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Fly Ash, Organic Manures and Inorganic Fertilizers on Nutrient Uptake of Rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to some other, relatively more acidic fly ash types (pH 6.0-8.1) such as those derived from sulphur-enriched coal materials (Gupta et al, 2002;Sheeba and Theresa, 2020), biomass-derived ashes (e.g., characterised in the present study) are substantially more alkaline (Table S2). In the present study, given relatively low solubility of the tested ash in neutral media (i.e., only 22% in distilled water; Table S2), a prolonged alkaline impact of this material can be expected in natural environments, which is important in acidic and well-watered, even transiently waterlogged, soils prevalent across the agricultural area in eastern Croatia (these acidic hydromorphic soils occupy more than 1.62 Mha).…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterisation Of Biomass Fly Ashmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to some other, relatively more acidic fly ash types (pH 6.0-8.1) such as those derived from sulphur-enriched coal materials (Gupta et al, 2002;Sheeba and Theresa, 2020), biomass-derived ashes (e.g., characterised in the present study) are substantially more alkaline (Table S2). In the present study, given relatively low solubility of the tested ash in neutral media (i.e., only 22% in distilled water; Table S2), a prolonged alkaline impact of this material can be expected in natural environments, which is important in acidic and well-watered, even transiently waterlogged, soils prevalent across the agricultural area in eastern Croatia (these acidic hydromorphic soils occupy more than 1.62 Mha).…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterisation Of Biomass Fly Ashmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Similarly, Lee et al (2019) reported that rice tiller numbers at 56 days after transplanting decreased with fly ash addition at the rates of 5% w/w (by 15%) and 10% w/w (by 32%); at 101 days after transplanting root and grain dry matter decreased by 2.75-fold and 6.2-fold, respectively, at 10% w/w fly ash rate compared to the control soil. The previous field (Gupta et al, 2002;Ondrašek et al, 2018;Sheeba and Theresa, 2020) and controlled-environment (Gu et al, 2011;Seyfferth et al, 2019) studies documented how fly ash, and even bottom ash (derived from the same plant facility/combustion technology fuelled by hard wood chips, as fly ash used in the present study) (Ondrasek et al, 2020b) at modest application rates benefited agronomic properties and growth of cultivated crops. For instance, relatively low soil application of fly ash (5-10% w/w) enhanced seed germination and seedling growth, but excessive application rates (20-30% w/w) delayed or significantly inhibited plant growth and development (Singh et al, 1997).…”
Section: Biomass Fly Ash Addition To Soil and Implications For Maize ...mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the ash produced from wood biomass is possible to apply in agriculture as soil fertilizer because of constituted nutrients and vital inorganic components such as C, O, H, Ca, K and, less frequently, N, S, Mg, P, Cl, Na, Mn, Zn, Fe, B, Cu or Mo. This application improves soil balance by providing a liming effect (alkaline pH) 6 , 7 . But, the pollution problem caused by ashes disposing is especially serious because they can contain high heavy metal concentrations 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%