2018
DOI: 10.3390/insects9010008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Grapevine Cultivar on the Second Generations of Lobesia botrana and Eupoecilia ambiguella

Abstract: Grapevine cultivar can affect susceptibility to Lobesia botrana and Eupoecilia ambiguella with important implications on control strategies. A four-year study was carried out in north-eastern Italy on 10 cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon, Carménère, Chardonnay, Merlot, Refosco dal Peduncolo Rosso, Rhine Riesling, Sauvignon Blanc, Terrano, Tocai Friulano and Verduzzo Friulano) grown in the same vineyard to assess whether the cultivar affects second-generation population levels of the two vine moths and L. botrana l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) is a traditional pest of grapes in Europe and the Middle East [1,2] and a new threat in the Americas [3,4]. Lobesia botrana coexists with the grape berry moth Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner) in several European regions, such as northern Italy, where they develop three generations per year in most areas and seasons [5]. The impact of L. botrana is increasing in Europe, probably because of climate change [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) is a traditional pest of grapes in Europe and the Middle East [1,2] and a new threat in the Americas [3,4]. Lobesia botrana coexists with the grape berry moth Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner) in several European regions, such as northern Italy, where they develop three generations per year in most areas and seasons [5]. The impact of L. botrana is increasing in Europe, probably because of climate change [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacillus thuringiensis is rarely used due to its lower efficacy and persistence than those of synthetic insecticides [ 13 ]. Additionally, choice of cultivar [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] and cultural practices such as controlled nitrogen fertilization [ 19 ], bunch-zone leaf removal [ 20 , 21 ], and kaolin applications [ 22 ] can help reduce infestations and damage by L. botrana .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional agriculture, this pest is primarily controlled by the use of broad-spectrum insecticides [19]. In organic plum orchards, good fruit protection can be achieved by alternating a low number of spinosad applications and mineral oil applications, despite the short period of effectiveness typical of spinosad [27].In other tortricid species, the effect of the cultivar in the oviposition choice has been assessed in field studies for Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller), Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner) Grapholita molesta (Busck), and Cydia pomonella (L.) [28][29][30][31]. In laboratory tests, preference for different apple cultivar was demonstrated for C. pomonella [32], whereas the influence of fruit characteristics like shape, size, texture and colour on L. botrana and E. ambiguella have been studied [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other tortricid species, the effect of the cultivar in the oviposition choice has been assessed in field studies for Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller), Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner) Grapholita molesta (Busck), and Cydia pomonella (L.) [28][29][30][31]. In laboratory tests, preference for different apple cultivar was demonstrated for C. pomonella [32], whereas the influence of fruit characteristics like shape, size, texture and colour on L. botrana and E. ambiguella have been studied [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%