2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Hand Cycling on Physical Capacity in the Rehabilitation of Persons With a Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, handcycling has emerged as an extremely efficient mode of ambulation that can be employed on a daily basis [13] and holds important applications in the field of clinical rehabilitation [14]. It is clear that the metabolic demand associated with moderate intensity handcycling facilitates sufficient energy expenditure to offer some protection against the onset of chronic and progressive conditions such as cardiovascular disease [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, handcycling has emerged as an extremely efficient mode of ambulation that can be employed on a daily basis [13] and holds important applications in the field of clinical rehabilitation [14]. It is clear that the metabolic demand associated with moderate intensity handcycling facilitates sufficient energy expenditure to offer some protection against the onset of chronic and progressive conditions such as cardiovascular disease [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arm cranking has received some scientific attention, due to its role in cardiovascular and injury rehabilitation (Carson 1989;Westhoff et al 2008), as well as being an appropriate mode for assessing upper body athletes (Tesch 1983;Driss et al 1998;Hubner-Wozniak et al 2004;Pearson et al 2007;Zagatto et al 2008) and individuals with spinal cord injury or lower limb disability (Hicks et al 2003;Goosey-Tolfrey et al 2006;Valent et al 2008). During upper body exercise, athletes trained for this type of work appear to be able to achieve a high proportion of their lower body VO 2peak , with seated arm cranking values of ~4.1 L .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Moreover, exercise intensities exceeding a relative oxygen consumption of 21 ml kg − 1 min − 1 are recommended to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. 6 However, it is unclear how these recommendations 6 can be achieved in people with tetraplegia where aerobic training typically relies on arm crank exercise (ACE) (13.6 ± 4.9 ml kg − 1 min − 1 ), 7 using hand securing devices in injuries at or above C6. 5 Accordingly, people with tetraplegia may not confer the cardiovascular benefits associated with regular exercise training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%