Second International Interactive Symposium on UHPC 2019
DOI: 10.21838/uhpc.9632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Heating and Cooling Temperature on the Performance of Tensile Interfacial Bond between High Strength Concrete and Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated in Figure 6, little change is observed after 28 days with an average of 0.01175% at 90 days. was 16.83 x 10 -6 while for the alternative test was 17.44 x 10 -6 mm/mm/ o C. This value is slightly above the recommended value of 13 x 10 -6 mm/mm/ o C by the Canadian Bridge Code but agrees with the range of values reported in the literature (Graybeal, 2006;Ahlborn et al 2008;Semendary et al 2019). The higher CTE value compared to conventional concrete is because this property highly depends on the CTE of the individual constituents of concrete.…”
Section: Shrinkagesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As illustrated in Figure 6, little change is observed after 28 days with an average of 0.01175% at 90 days. was 16.83 x 10 -6 while for the alternative test was 17.44 x 10 -6 mm/mm/ o C. This value is slightly above the recommended value of 13 x 10 -6 mm/mm/ o C by the Canadian Bridge Code but agrees with the range of values reported in the literature (Graybeal, 2006;Ahlborn et al 2008;Semendary et al 2019). The higher CTE value compared to conventional concrete is because this property highly depends on the CTE of the individual constituents of concrete.…”
Section: Shrinkagesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As a standard, the CSA prescribed inverse analysis was not found to be adequately robust in obtaining the tensile properties of UHPFRC. This is also proven by advanced computational simulations (Ralli et al, 2021) In the current development of the Annex, a different method for characterization of the material in tension is considered. The new approach quantifies the strain energy absorbed by the beam under flexure and throughout the range of the elastic and hardening part of the response.…”
Section: Tensile Response Using Inverse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%