2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of herbaceous and woody vegetation control on seedling microclimate, leaf gas exchange, water status, and nutrient relations of Pinus strobus L. seedlings planted in a shelterwood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Understory vegetation was indicated as a competitor of resources in the field, and controlling understory vegetation could increase nutrient concentrations of planted seedlings [14]. Contrary to previous reports, our results showed that removing understory vegetation and associated litter had no effect on seedling [N] and [P].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understory vegetation was indicated as a competitor of resources in the field, and controlling understory vegetation could increase nutrient concentrations of planted seedlings [14]. Contrary to previous reports, our results showed that removing understory vegetation and associated litter had no effect on seedling [N] and [P].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As for the introduced seedlings in the understory, removal of existing understory vegetation may be beneficial for seedling growth due to reducing competition for resources such as light and soil nutrients. For example, Parker et al (2012) demonstrated that controlling herbaceous vegetation can increase leaf [N] and [P] of eastern white pine [14] . However, such treatment effects may differ depending on the variation of understory vegetation type and the intrinsic trait of introduced species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies of the effects of competition on tree growth have shown crop-tree stem diameter to be the best allometric indicator of competition for growing resources, with stem height and mortality being comparatively invariant in all but the more extreme competition levels [45]. In this study, planted pine stem diameters responded strongly and positively to the increased light, soil moisture and nutrient availability associated with both herbaceous and woody vegetation control (Figure 2; [29,30,32]). Close examination of the stem diameter response surfaces reveals clear similarities between the clearcut (Figure 2a) and the NB shelterwood (Figure 2b), suggesting comparative competitive environments at these sites, despite large differences in overtopping residual cover ( Figure 6).…”
Section: The Three Sites In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 51%
“…Since seedlings exposed to full sunlight on the clearcut sustained high incidence of weevil attack, our preliminary recommendations focused on the proactive, early suppression of herbaceous vegetation to reduce competition for soil moisture and nutrients [31]. The two shelterwood environments proved just as competitive as the clearcut, but sunlight was often the most limiting resource, given that the mature overstories intercepted substantial available quantities of light [32]. Our 6th-year recommendations from these shelterwoods emphasized thinning of mature stands from below to allow 50% to 60% of full sunlight into the understory (something that was not being done consistently in operations of the time), followed by the proactive, early suppression of both woody and herbaceous vegetation to maintain optimum light levels and reduce competition for soil moisture and nutrients [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%