Influence of immediate dentin sealing and interim cementation on the adhesion of indirect restorations with dual-polymerizing resin cement

Hironaka, Nallu Gomes Lima; Ubaldini, Adriana Lemos Mori; Sato, Francielle; Giannini, Marcelo; Terada, Raquel Sano Suga; Pascotto, Renata Corrêa

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.001

Cited by 15 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After 3 months, IDS groups did not differ significantly from control group. Hironaka et al 2018 39 In vitro Bond strength, Interim cement Investigated the effect of IDS (Clearfil SE Bond+ Protect Liner F) and interim cement (Temp Bond NE) on the bond strength of indirect restorations luted with a dual-cure resin cement (Panavia F 2.0). IDS provided higher μTBS values, whereas the interim cement did not interfere with bond quality if IDS was applied.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The question is whether the remaining residues affect the bond strength to such an extent that makes bonding insufficient. 39 Some authors have reported a reduction in the bond strength of resin materials only after use of eugenol-containing cements, 40 , 41 whereas other scholars have not discriminated the type of interim cement. 42 To counteract the drawbacks of eugenol (interaction with initiators, loss of retention, microleakage 43 ), one could propose its replacement by carboxylic acids.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…13 It has been demonstrated that if IDS is applied, regardless of the use of eugenol-containing or eugenol-free provisional luting agents, 43 interim materials do not influence the adhesion quality of resin cements. 39,[43][44][45][46] Schoenbaum et al 35 suggested the "reverse spot bonding technique" for provisional cementation. This technique relies on the bonding of the provisional material in only a small area of the IDS-prepared tooth, away from the margins.…”

Section: Interaction With Provisional Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Samartzi¹,

Papalexopoulos²,

Sarafianou³

et al. 2021

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The immediate application of a dentin-bonding agent after tooth preparation and before impression-taking (immediate dentin sealing [IDS]) has been suggested to provide several advantages concerning bacterial microleakage, hypersensitivity, and bonding quality. We reviewed the literature and clarified certain aspects related to each step of IDS application. Materials and Methods The search strategy comprised an electronic research in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Ovid and Scopus for studies published from January 1990 to December 2020 regarding the IDS technique and including both in vitro and clinical studies. Results After exclusion of irrelevant or duplicate articles, 88 articles focusing on aspects of the IDS technique were assessed. IDS seems to be advantageous with regard to bond strength, gap formation, bacterial microleakage, and dentin hypersensitivity. However, issues arising from interaction with impression materials, the provisional phase, and conditioning methods before cementation require further investigation. Conclusion There are no documented reasons preventing clinicians applying IDS in their everyday practice. On the contrary, the presented technique seems to be beneficial in certain aspects regarding indirect restorations.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interaction With Provisional Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Samartzi¹,

Papalexopoulos²,

Sarafianou³

et al. 2021

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies on the efficacy of both IDS approaches and PA pretreatment were all dentin bond strength assessments (9,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). These tests were performed on flat small-surface areas of tooth structure; therefore, the effects of more complex inlay cavity and related C-factor and compliance of cavity design were not involved.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of proanthocyanidin mediated immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the strength of premolars restored with composite resin inlay

Shafıei¹,

Aghaei²,

Jowkar³

2020

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) with proanthocyanidin (PA) could be used before cementation with a self-adhesive (SA) cement. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of PA treatment on acid-etched dentin before adhesive application, in IDS and delayed dentin sealing (DDS), on the strengthening property of SA-cemented composite resin inlay in premolars. Material and Methods: Eighty-four maxillary premolars were divided into 7 groups (n=12): 1) (Intact) Sound teeth served as controls; groups 2-7) After cavity preparation and fabrication of composite resin inlay, temporary inlays were made and cemented. After one week, the inlays were removed and composite inlays were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement as follows: 2) (SA) Without dentin-pretreatment; 3) (DDS) Etch-and-rinse adhesive before the cementation; 4) (DDS/PA) PA treatment of acid-etched dentin before the adhesive, followed by the cementation; 5) (Etch/PA) PA treatment of acid-etched dentin before the cementation; 6 and 7) (IDS and IDS/PA) Application of IDS without or with PA treatment, respectively, one week before the cementation. After thermo-mechanical aging, fracture resistance (FR) was tested. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane tests (α=0.05). Results: There was a significant difference between the study groups (P < 0.001). The IDS and IDS/PA groups yielded significantly higher FR compared to the SA group (P ≤ 0.003), but the DDS, DDS/PA and Etch/PA groups did not differ from the SA group (P > 0.05). The effect of PA on FR in the IDS and DDS techniques was not significant. Conclusions: IDS with or without PA treatment considerably improved the strength of premolars with self-adhesive-cemented inlay, while the value of only IDS with PA treatment reached the level of the sound teeth.

show abstract

Effect of temporary cements and their removal methods on the bond strength of indirect restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives For a conventional indirect restoration, temporary cementation inevitably contaminated collapsed dentin collagen. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the optimal strategy for minimizing its negative effects. Material and methods Databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for in vitro studies, involving the influence of immediate dentin sealing (IDS), different temporary cements, and their removal strategies on dentin bond strength. The meta-analysis used the inverse variance method with effect method of the standardized mean difference and statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05. The I2 value and the Q-test were used to assess the heterogeneity. Results A total of 14 in vitro trials were subjected to the meta-analysis. Within the study’s limitations, we assumed that IDS eliminated the negative effects of temporary bonding, achieving the comparable immediate bond strength with the control (p = 0.46). In contrast, under delayed dentin sealing (DDS), temporary cementation statistically decreased bond strength (p = 0.002). Compared with resin-based and non-eugenol zinc oxide cements, polycarboxylate and calcium hydroxide cements performed better on bond strength with no statistical difference from the control group (p > 0.05). Among the removal methods of temporary cements, the Al2O3 abrasion restored the decreased bond strength (p = 0.07) and performed better than hand instruments alone (p = 0.04), while pumice removal slightly reduced the bond strength in contrast with the control group (p = 0.05, 95% CI = − 1.62 to 0). Conclusions The choices of IDS, polycarboxylate and calcium hydroxide temporary cements, Al2O3 abrasion removal method were feasible and efficient to enhance the bond strength. Clinical relevance It is worthwhile applying IDS technique, polycarboxylate and calcium hydroxide temporary cements during indirect restoration. The Al2O3 abrasion of cleaning dentin can minimize the negative effects of temporary cement.

show abstract

Influence of immediate dentin sealing and interim cementation on the adhesion of indirect restorations with dual-polymerizing resin cement

Cited by 15 publications

References 25 publications

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Effect of proanthocyanidin mediated immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the strength of premolars restored with composite resin inlay

Effect of temporary cements and their removal methods on the bond strength of indirect restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About