2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-014-0570-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Item Distribution Pattern and Abundance on Efficiency of Benthic Core Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were collected in freshwater impoundments and unmanaged salt marsh, and we further separated salt marsh into four categories: high marsh (irregularly flooded by tides), low marsh (regularly flooded), mudflat, and subtidal habitats. Cores were collected with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) corer measuring either 5.1 (NJ1 and NJ2) or 10.2 cm in diameter (NY and VA), pushed into the substrate to 12.7 cm in depth; Behney et al (2014) showed that the size of the core sample has only a weak effect on the precision of energy estimates. After collection, samples were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and dye and stored for later processing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were collected in freshwater impoundments and unmanaged salt marsh, and we further separated salt marsh into four categories: high marsh (irregularly flooded by tides), low marsh (regularly flooded), mudflat, and subtidal habitats. Cores were collected with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) corer measuring either 5.1 (NJ1 and NJ2) or 10.2 cm in diameter (NY and VA), pushed into the substrate to 12.7 cm in depth; Behney et al (2014) showed that the size of the core sample has only a weak effect on the precision of energy estimates. After collection, samples were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and dye and stored for later processing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we found that the most appropriate model to fit to the data varied dramatically among sites and habitats; fitting the same degree polynomial to different data sets did a poor job of consistently estimating the point of diminishing returns. Visual approximation is likely the best method for identifying the point of diminishing returns in highly variable data (Bond et al 2001). Here, we visually estimated the point of diminishing returns (rounded to the nearest five cores) for each habitat at each site.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, researchers have demonstrated the effects of sample gear and acquisition (Behney et al 2014;Ringelman et al 2015), preservation method (Salonen and Sarvala 1985), sorting (Hagy et al 2011), subsampling (Stafford et al 2011), and other factors (Williams et al 2014) on estimating biomass of waterfowl foods from core samples, but data were previously unavailable on the effects of processing solvents on biomass estimates. Contrary to our original hypothesis, we found a negative effect on wet biomass of exposing larvae to H 2 O 2 , but consistent with our hypothesis we found no substantial effect of H 2 O 2 on dry mass during typical periods of exposure to H 2 O 2 (,5 min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All core samples were 5 cm in diameter (Behney et al ) and 5 cm deep (Evans‐Peters ) and included the water column. If a random core sample location was deeper than 50 cm, I noted the conditions but did not collect a core sample because these are not conditions associated with feeding by dabbling ducks; I then selected a new random core location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%