2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of laser spot size and shape on ablation efficiency using ultrashort pulse laser system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By now three different methods are known to determine the threshold fluence. B. Neuenschwander 3 5 measures the ablated volume, Liu 2 the bore radius and J. Hermann et al 2 , 6 . the ablation depth.…”
Section: Materials Characterization For Usp Machining Of Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By now three different methods are known to determine the threshold fluence. B. Neuenschwander 3 5 measures the ablated volume, Liu 2 the bore radius and J. Hermann et al 2 , 6 . the ablation depth.…”
Section: Materials Characterization For Usp Machining Of Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now three different methods are known to determine the threshold fluence. B. Neuenschwander [3][4][5] measures the ablated volume, Liu 2 the bore radius and J. Hermann et al 2,6 the ablation depth. For all approaches, the threshold fluence is considered a material-specific constant.…”
Section: Determination Of the Threshold Fluencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both mentioned approaches, the working position and the size of the laser spot are critical process parameters, which have a significant influence on the final result and even shifts of a few micrometres in the working position can lead to deviations in the process results 15 . In particular, for the 3D processing of components and parts, an optimal process control of the working distance is fundamental 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state-of-the-art scientific investigation of laser ablation efficiency suggested the ratio of laser peak fluence to the ablation threshold close to e 2 ≈ 7.39 for the maximum material ejection rate and the most efficient ablation point 30,31 . Since then, laser ablation efficiency has been investigated in numerous papers in independent groups [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] . The model takes into account the transverse laser intensity distribution has a Gaussian profile, ablation occurs after fluence exceeds the ablation threshold, and ablated depth per pulse is growing logarithmically with the laser fluence on the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%