AuTHORSDue to their different physical beam characteristics, there are fundamental differences in the process behavior of Co 2 lasers and solid-state lasers during deep penetration welding. High-quality full penetration welds can be achieved in thick sheet metal with both beam sources. However, the beam sources differ in regards to productivity, process stability, and seam quality depending on the material being welded.CO 2 lasers and solid-state lasers (SSLs) are the most commonly used beam sources for laser welding. featuring high laser power combined with high beam quality, CO 2 lasers have been on the market since the 1980s. Thanks to their high electrical efficiency and the simplicity of guiding the beam through appropriate cables, SSLs with wavelengths around the 1 µm mark are increasingly used in industrial manufacturing. The development of diode-pumped disk and fiber lasers enabled these laser systems to catch up on CO 2 lasers regarding power and beam parameter product, resulting in an increase in the maximum attainable weld depth.Virtually all industrial thick sheet metal applications larger than 8 mm require a full penetration weld for reasons of strength, for example in the fields of shipbuilding, train and railroad construction, and pipeline engineering as well as for welding axle drives [1]. While deep penetration welding using CO 2 lasers is characterized by outstanding seam quality allied to high process reliability over a broad range of parameters, the seam quality achieved using solid-state lasers is more dependent on the material and process parameters. This article will compare the suitability of the two beam sources for full penetration welding.