2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of machining errors on form errors of microlens arrays in ultra-precision turning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedures of single point diamond turning of microlens arrays on a flat surface were described by Zhang et al [20]. A design model is first generated based on the ideal structures of microlens array.…”
Section: Ultraprecision Machining Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The procedures of single point diamond turning of microlens arrays on a flat surface were described by Zhang et al [20]. A design model is first generated based on the ideal structures of microlens array.…”
Section: Ultraprecision Machining Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1980s, the fabrication of microlens array is realized by different methods, such as Micro-electromechanical Systems (MEMS) based technologies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and ultraprecision machining technologies [18][19][20]. However, little work has been focused on the comparison of these method in terms of the surface finish, form error and the efficiency of production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both B-axis and C-axis serve as the angular servo axis. e 5-axis measuring machine composes of eight-part rigid bodies [18], as shown in Figure 2. e base of the 5-axis measuring machine is selected as the zeroth-order body, and the remaining adjacent bodies are numbered in sequence; thus, the Z-axis, Y-axis, C-axis, workpiece, X-axis, B-axis, and the measurement probe are represented by rigid body 1 to 7 in succession, respectively.…”
Section: E Description Of the 5-axis Measuring Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the position errors and some orientation errors can be Mathematical Problems in Engineering negligible in measurement error modeling because of the choice of the coordinate system and reference position, and there remain only seven orientation errors, which refer to the volumetric squareness errors among the five axes [7]. It means that the location errors can be ignored when the squareness errors are fully considered; therefore, it can be considered that a 5-axis measuring machine totally introduces 37 geometric error items; this simplification will not affect the analysis result and is generally accepted in the field of machine tool [7,18,27]. e influence of 37 geometric errors on the measurement result for a 5-axis measuring machine is investigated in this study, and the label from h 1 to h 37 is successively employed to stand for all 37 geometric errors for convenience, as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Geometric Errors and Characteristic Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%