2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
238
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
238
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To develop bone graft substitutes the simplest methodology is to statically culture cells on highly porous scaffolds in the presence of differentiation medium (Farrell, E et al, 2006;Farrell et al, 2007;Keogh et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2005;St-Pierre et al, 2005;Tierney et al, 2009). However, static culturing regimes neglect the important role of biomechanical stimuli in the normal formation, development and homeostasis of bone tissue: the effects of which are clearly observed when normal, physiologically relevant levels of mechanical stimulation are removed (Morey and Baylink, 1978;Zerwekh et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To develop bone graft substitutes the simplest methodology is to statically culture cells on highly porous scaffolds in the presence of differentiation medium (Farrell, E et al, 2006;Farrell et al, 2007;Keogh et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2005;St-Pierre et al, 2005;Tierney et al, 2009). However, static culturing regimes neglect the important role of biomechanical stimuli in the normal formation, development and homeostasis of bone tissue: the effects of which are clearly observed when normal, physiologically relevant levels of mechanical stimulation are removed (Morey and Baylink, 1978;Zerwekh et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the authors are unaware of any studies directed at evaluating the detachment of cells cultured on highly porous scaffolds in response to fluid-flow. Highly porous scaffolds contain exceedingly irregular geometries as a consequence of the freeze drying (Mandal and Kundu, 2008;O'Brien et al, 2004) or salt leaching (Kim et al, 2005) fabrication processes, resulting in non-uniform flow profiles that make shear stress characterisation very challenging. Furthermore, technical limitations in visualising cells internally within the construct, means correlating cell detachment to the magnitude of shear stress at the point of detachment is exceptionally difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cellular proliferation [1,5], differentiation [6][7][8], deposition of new structural proteins [9,10] and ultimately the regeneration of functional tissue [4,11,12]. Traditionally, methods such as NMR, FTIR and X-Ray spectroscopy have been used to assess biomaterials at the molecular level [13][14][15][16][17], while SEM and TEM have been invaluable tools for characterizing the three dimensional morphology of biomaterial scaffolds [5,[18][19][20][21][22][23]. Histology and immunostaining as well as assays for determining the expression levels of specific proteins are often used to assess how scaffolds interact with cells as tissues develop [5,10,18,20,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Competing Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, methods such as NMR, FTIR and X-Ray spectroscopy have been used to assess biomaterials at the molecular level [13][14][15][16][17], while SEM and TEM have been invaluable tools for characterizing the three dimensional morphology of biomaterial scaffolds [5,[18][19][20][21][22][23]. Histology and immunostaining as well as assays for determining the expression levels of specific proteins are often used to assess how scaffolds interact with cells as tissues develop [5,10,18,20,[22][23][24]. While all of these approaches provide sensitive and specific data, they are invasive.…”
Section: Competing Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation