2002
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2002.802436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of magnetization processes and device geometry on the GMI effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this result coincides with that obtained previously by using simple estimations [17,19]. The optimum shell thickness is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this result coincides with that obtained previously by using simple estimations [17,19]. The optimum shell thickness is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this connection, the composite wires may have, in principle, more soft magnetic properties, which is key factor for magnetic-field sensors. In contrast to amorphous wires, the GMI effect in the composite wires is not restricted by the change of the skin depth under the influence of the external magnetic field [19]. In this case, the GMI effect is mainly driven by the inductance of the shell and the resistance of the core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The pure theoretical analysis allows gaining insight in the involved phenomena, but fails to accurately describe the experimental results. In fact, the theory predicts values for the MI ratio of the order of 10 4 % [61,62] that have never, by far, been observed. This discrepancy is caused first by nonideal conditions on real samples: complex domain structure, finite size, etc.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations By Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The maximal values of relative change in annealed samples impedance module were registered at driving frequencies of 3-4 MHz. Such maximal values were caused by decrease in magnetic permeability at higher frequencies [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%