1993
DOI: 10.1016/0927-7757(93)80201-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of major process and formulation parameters On microfluidized fat globule size distribution and example of a practical consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This heating resulting from the degradation of the high process energy input would influence the particles size in diverse way (Robin, Remillard, & Paquin, 1993). For example, in a similar O/W emulsion stabilized by proteins, a 10°C rise in temperature range of 40-70°C has allowed a reduction in the average size of the fatty globules by 6 to 15%, but this effect decreased above 80°C.…”
Section: Role Of Emulsifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This heating resulting from the degradation of the high process energy input would influence the particles size in diverse way (Robin, Remillard, & Paquin, 1993). For example, in a similar O/W emulsion stabilized by proteins, a 10°C rise in temperature range of 40-70°C has allowed a reduction in the average size of the fatty globules by 6 to 15%, but this effect decreased above 80°C.…”
Section: Role Of Emulsifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, inertial forces in turbulent flow along with cavitation are predominantly responsible for droplet disruption in microfluidizer (Dalgleish, Tosh, & West, 1996;Maa & Hsu, 1999;Robin, Blanchot, Vuillemard, & Paquin, 1992;Schultz et al, 2004). There are many studies regarding the application of microfluidizer in the homogenization of milk and dairy model emulsions (Dalgleish et al, 1996;McCrae, 1994;Olson et al, 2004;Robin et al, 1992, Robin, Remillard, & Paquin, 1993Strawbridge, Ray, Hallett, Tosh, & Dalgleish, 1995). Some workers believe microfluidization is superior because, EDS distributions appeared to be narrower and smaller in microfluidized emulsions than in the traditional emulsifying devices (Dalgleish et al, 1996;Pinnamaneni, Das, & Das, 2003;Robin et al, 1992;Strawbridge et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Emulsifiers have the ability to decrease the interfacial tension between the oil and water phases, thus reducing the pressure gradient required to deform and/or disrupt the droplets while forming the dispersion system (Robin et al 1993;Marie-France et al 1999). Therefore, the emulsifier is able to form a protective membrane that reduces the tendency for droplets to coalesce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%