2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc00630b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of molecular structure on the antimicrobial function of phenylenevinylene conjugated oligoelectrolytes

Abstract: Structure/property relationships were obtained to understand the antimicrobial function of conjugated oligoelectrolytes toward Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
102
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COE association and disruption is not driven by a charge‐based mechanism, as indicated by the sensitivity to COEs of AMP‐resistant mutant microbes that are unable to carry out charge‐based microbial‐envelope modifications . The length of the conjugated component in phenylenevinylene‐based structures modulates antimicrobial activity, and shorter COEs are typically more inhibitory . The MIC for Escherichia coli K12 decreases from 512 μ m to 64 μ m over a range of structural variations spanning five to three phenylene units.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…COE association and disruption is not driven by a charge‐based mechanism, as indicated by the sensitivity to COEs of AMP‐resistant mutant microbes that are unable to carry out charge‐based microbial‐envelope modifications . The length of the conjugated component in phenylenevinylene‐based structures modulates antimicrobial activity, and shorter COEs are typically more inhibitory . The MIC for Escherichia coli K12 decreases from 512 μ m to 64 μ m over a range of structural variations spanning five to three phenylene units.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the conventional molecular design, a COE with a stilbene core, namely COE2‐2 , was shown to have less antimicrobial activity (MIC=169 μg mL −1 ) than its distyryl benzene counterpart, COE2‐3 (MIC=11.4 μg mL −1 ), against E. coli K12 (Figure a) . Further analysis revealed that COE2‐2 had considerably weaker affinity for cell membranes relative to the longer molecules, likely because of its altered polar/hydrophobic profile.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,15,21,22 Despite its utility, the origin of DSSN+ improvement in bioelectrochemical devices remains under debate. 9,10,17,21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Model membrane studies have shown that COEs increase ion conductance across the membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a), are of particular interest for their ability to modify membrane properties and improve performance of bioelectrochemical devices. 14,15 COEs have a p-delocalized backbone bearing ionic pendant groups and are known to spontaneously intercalate into lipid bilayers. COEs have shown to improve electrochemical performance in devices utilizing yeast, 13 Escherichia coli, 16 Shewanella oneidensis, 10,15 mixed communities, 17 and even membrane-based photosystems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth considering that the light penetration increases and light toxicity decreases with longer wavelengths . Most MICOEs absorb blue‐UV light, which limits their use in PDAT ,. We thus designed PTTP , see Scheme .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%