1973
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-197304000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Oxisuran, a Differential Inhibitor of Cell-Mediated Hypersensitivity, on Allograft Survival and Humoral Immunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental immunosuppressive agent, oxisuran, was also shown to be selectively toxic for T cells in our cell culture system. This finding correlates with previous animal studies which demonstrate the selective cellular immunosuppressive effects of this drug, with sparing of humoral immune responses [21,42,43]. Human plasma levels of oxisuran have not been reported but, in our cell culture system, the toxic concentration of oxisuran was found to be high relative to the other drugs studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental immunosuppressive agent, oxisuran, was also shown to be selectively toxic for T cells in our cell culture system. This finding correlates with previous animal studies which demonstrate the selective cellular immunosuppressive effects of this drug, with sparing of humoral immune responses [21,42,43]. Human plasma levels of oxisuran have not been reported but, in our cell culture system, the toxic concentration of oxisuran was found to be high relative to the other drugs studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The drugs were chosen from a broad range of pharmacologic classes including alkylating agents, purine and pyrimidine analogues and folic acid analogues. All of these drugs have demonstrated suppressive effects on immune function in humans, animal models and/or in vitro systems of cellular and/or humoral immunity [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and, with the exception of oxisuran, are all in current clinical usage. Although the mechanism of action of cytotoxicity has been established for certain of these study drugs, the question of why they also cause immune dysfunction has not been answered at the biochemical level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freedman let al ( 16) and Fox et al (17) have reported that oxisuran suppresses skingraft rejections in mice, rats, and dogs but has no effect on antibody production. It differs from established immunosuppressants (e.g., glucocorticoids, antimetabolites) , which are capable of suppressing both.…”
Section: Ige-like Antibody Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, oxisuran had little or no apparent effect on T. pallidum multiplication. This finding is not entirely unexpected since evidence suggests that oxisuran preferentially suppresses cellmediated immunity (6)(7)(8). Although the mechanism of action of adrenal corticosteroids, including dexamethasone, is not completely understood, it appears that steroid therapy also suppresses the host's cellular immunity in experimental syphilis (16), and thus it might be expected that oxisuran would add little to the immunosuppression resulting from dexamethasone treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In an unpublished study, Arko found that the development of syphilitic skin lesions in rabbits could be prevented by using systemic immunosuppressive drugs and by allowing sufficient time (at least 3 months) for a connective tissue capsule to form around the chamber before inoculation. In such rabbits temporary multiplication of T. pallidum occurred in subcutaneous chambers, the largest treponemal yields being obtained in rabbits treated with both oxisuran, a reported differential inhibitor of cell-mediated hypersensitivity (6)(7)(8), and dexametha-T. PALLIDUM SUBCUTANEOUS CHAMBER INFECTION sone. With respect to the subcutaneous chamber model in general, Arko has reported that rabbits provided a larger source of chamber fluid and serum for laboratory testing and that guinea pigs were susceptible to secondary infection with a variety of microorganisms, thus requiring more care and more meticulous surgical technique in the implantation and inoculation procedures (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%