2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of p53 codon 72 exon 4, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1*B polymorphisms in lung cancer risk in a Brazilian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with GST null polymorphism cannot detoxify carcinogenic metabolites efficiently. Moreover, the risk of cancer increases in these individuals in the presence of p53 codon 72 Pro allele, because it has lower potential to induce apoptosis (Honma et al, 2008). However, in the present study, results suggest that polymorphism of GST and p53 gene alone or in combination did not impart risk for AML development.…”
Section: Chauhan Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Individuals with GST null polymorphism cannot detoxify carcinogenic metabolites efficiently. Moreover, the risk of cancer increases in these individuals in the presence of p53 codon 72 Pro allele, because it has lower potential to induce apoptosis (Honma et al, 2008). However, in the present study, results suggest that polymorphism of GST and p53 gene alone or in combination did not impart risk for AML development.…”
Section: Chauhan Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Of these publications, three (Biros et al 2001a;Fan et al 2000;Murata et al 1996) were excluded because the same data were available in other studies (Biros et al 2001b;Miller et al 2002;Murata et al 1998). In three of the remaining 28 publications (Birgander et al 1995;Biros et al 2001a;Fernandez-Rubio et al 2008;Giuliani et al 2007;Hiraki et al 2003;Honma et al 2008;Irarrazabal et al 2003;Jain et al 2005;Jin et al 1995;Jung et al 2008;Liu et al 2001;Mechanic et al 2007;Miller et al 2002;Murata et al 1998;Nadji et al 2007;Papadakis et al 2002;Pierce et al 2000;Popanda et al 2007;Sakiyama et al 2005;Sreeja et al 2008;Szymanowska et al 2006;To-Figueras et al 1996;Wang et al 1999;Weston et al 1992;Weston et al 1994;Wu et al 2002;Zhang et al 2003;Zhang et al 2006), the ORs were presented separately according to the diVerent ethnicities: Mechanic et al (2007) sorted the data in African and Caucasian, respectively; Pierce et al (2000) presented the data according to Caucasian, Asian, and Mixed descent, respectively; and Jin et al (1995) presented the data according to African-American and Mexican-American, respectively. Therefore, each cohort in one publication was considered for pooling anal...…”
Section: Main Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the main characteristics of these studies. Among the 23 publications, 22 were published in English [9,[12][13][14]22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], and one was in Chinese [44]. The sample sizes ranged from 80 to 2424.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%