2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-012-9881-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Parameter Variations on WC-Co Splat Formation in an HVOF Process Using a New Beam-Shutter Device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the deposition of particles containing larger carbides results in void spaces where the particles have failed to amalgamate with surrounding particles. A confirming trend has been observed in corresponding studies [36][37][38], with authors attributing the increased flattening of particles following impact to the presence of smaller carbides within the feedstock powder [36]. It should be noted that further optimisation of the spray parameters could reduce the level of porosity within each respective coating.…”
Section: Surface Topographysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the deposition of particles containing larger carbides results in void spaces where the particles have failed to amalgamate with surrounding particles. A confirming trend has been observed in corresponding studies [36][37][38], with authors attributing the increased flattening of particles following impact to the presence of smaller carbides within the feedstock powder [36]. It should be noted that further optimisation of the spray parameters could reduce the level of porosity within each respective coating.…”
Section: Surface Topographysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The high particle temperature is sufficient to cause flattening [43] of the alumina particles. However, due to the oxide particles being larger than the carbides retained in the cermet powders [36][37][38], the porosity of the Al2O3 coating is greater than that of WC-CoCr and Cr3C2-NiCr. Results of SEM analysis present consistent chemical composition throughout the coating.…”
Section: Surface Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity of WC-12Co coating calculated using the metallographic method was 1.62%, while the porosity of nanostructured WC-Co/Al coating was only 0.57%. Tillmann et al [23] reported that the porosity of coatings decreased with the improvement of the single particles flattening. The phenomena observed in Figures 5 and 6 are in agreement with the conclusion from Tillmann et al…”
Section: Deposition Behavior Of the Powdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity values of the WC-10Ni, Ni45, and NiCr coatings sprayed with the same parameters are 0.78%, 1.03%, and 0.63%, respectively, and the corresponding surface roughness values, R z , are 23.4 µm, 43.2 µm, and 52.7 µm. The porosity of the coatings is determined by the spraying process and parameters, powder material, and particle size [27]. Table 3 shows the melting point of raw materials.…”
Section: Coating Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%