2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1029959914040055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of phase interface properties on mechanical characteristics of metal ceramic composites

Abstract: The paper reports on theoretical study to elucidate the influence of geometric (width) and mechanical characteristics of phase interfaces on strength, ultimate strain, and fracture energy of metal ceramic composites. The study was performed by computer simulation with the movable cellular automaton method and a well-developed mesoscale structural composite model that takes explicit account of wide transition zones between reinforcing inclusions and the matrix. It is shown that the formation of relatively wide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above-described deformation behavior of the heterophase material is due to the difference in elastic moduli of austenite and carbide (G = 80-85 GPa for FeCrMnNiCo [25] and G ≈ 140 GPa for M 23 C 6 [26] in the temperature range 77-300 K), so that the FeCrMnNiCo-5C alloy under loading behaves like a dispersion-reinforced metal-matrix composite with the compliant austenitic matrix and rigid carbide inclusions [27,28]. In such materials, rigid inclusions act as stress concentrators, which, even at low macroscopic loads, can cause significant distortion of stress fields around inclusions and plastic deformation of the compliant plastic matrix already at the initial stages of deformation (well below the macroscopic yield stress) [27,28]. At late plastic flow, they can activate slip systems with nonmaximum Schmid factors [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-described deformation behavior of the heterophase material is due to the difference in elastic moduli of austenite and carbide (G = 80-85 GPa for FeCrMnNiCo [25] and G ≈ 140 GPa for M 23 C 6 [26] in the temperature range 77-300 K), so that the FeCrMnNiCo-5C alloy under loading behaves like a dispersion-reinforced metal-matrix composite with the compliant austenitic matrix and rigid carbide inclusions [27,28]. In such materials, rigid inclusions act as stress concentrators, which, even at low macroscopic loads, can cause significant distortion of stress fields around inclusions and plastic deformation of the compliant plastic matrix already at the initial stages of deformation (well below the macroscopic yield stress) [27,28]. At late plastic flow, they can activate slip systems with nonmaximum Schmid factors [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest way of implicitly taking into account these factors is to change (increase) the inclination angle of the interpolation line in Fig. 10, as compared to the inclination angle of the ''basic'' interpolation line (obtained with regard to the influence of only secondary carbide phase nanoparticles) [72]. Notice that the increase in the inclination angle effectively reflects an increase in the concentration of impurities and lattice defects and a corresponding growth of local internal stresses.…”
Section: Metal-ceramic Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the performed uniaxial compression and threepoint bending tests on submicron-sized specimens have allowed us to estimate the characteristic values of the inclination angle of the interpolation line in Fig. 10 and to determine the mechanical parameters of distinct elements belonging to different transition zone areas [72]. This provided a basis for the study of how the phase interface width influences the integral mechanical characteristics of the metal-ceramic composite in three-point bending.…”
Section: Metal-ceramic Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier author, as well as other researchers, has used rather complex material models, such as Johnson-Holmquist model for ceramics and toughened adhesive polymer model for polymer [14,15]. Generally, such selection is rational, especially for ceramics as it destructs under cracks nucleation and influence of matrix-particle interface properties [16]. However, application of these models for composite on the base of ceramic grains may cause computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%