2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of phase stability on the in situ growth stresses in Cu/Nb multilayered films

Abstract: As the length scale of individual layers were reduced in a Cu/Nb multilayer, a face centered cubic (fcc)-to-body centered cubic (bcc) and bcc-to-fcc transformations were noted for Cu and Nb respectively. In addition, at equal fractions of Cu/Nb and at a very thin thickness, the layers vitrified. These phase transformations have been modeled using a thermodynamic phase diagram where strain, interfacial, and volumetric energy considerations were used to determine the phase as a function of the bilayer thickness … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a highly coherent interface and strong chemical interaction between the metal and ceramic layers, the interfacial mobility of metal atoms can be suppressed, resulting in a superheating of the confined metal . It is generally acknowledged that the atomic mobility and associated thermal stability may be greatly affected by the growth stresses and thermally induced stresses in the metal layer. Notably, fast diffusion of metal atoms along incoherent and weakly bonded metal–ceramic interfaces can be surprisingly fast due to the relatively low activation energies of vacancy formation and migration in the metal . Hence, depending on the nature of the metal–ceramic interface and the residual stress state, the microstructural response of metal nanolayers upon thermal/mechanical post-treatment can be distinctly different between confined and nonconfined metal–ceramic nanolaminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a highly coherent interface and strong chemical interaction between the metal and ceramic layers, the interfacial mobility of metal atoms can be suppressed, resulting in a superheating of the confined metal . It is generally acknowledged that the atomic mobility and associated thermal stability may be greatly affected by the growth stresses and thermally induced stresses in the metal layer. Notably, fast diffusion of metal atoms along incoherent and weakly bonded metal–ceramic interfaces can be surprisingly fast due to the relatively low activation energies of vacancy formation and migration in the metal . Hence, depending on the nature of the metal–ceramic interface and the residual stress state, the microstructural response of metal nanolayers upon thermal/mechanical post-treatment can be distinctly different between confined and nonconfined metal–ceramic nanolaminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common methods is reflection high-energy electron diffraction, which is used to monitor the growth progress during material synthesis by PVD [6]. Growth stresses are another commonly studied property that may be monitored during deposition, and provide insight into the microstructure of the final NMMs [239]. In addition, in situ XRD tests have been used to study the evolution of the microstructure of NMMs upon exposure to ion irradiation [200,240] and to determine their deformation behavior upon heating/cooling [36,194].…”
Section: Conventional Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens for APT were prepared by a focused ion beam (FIB; Scientific Quanta Dual Beam FIB/ Lyra Tescan FIB, Thermo Fisher Scientific) lift‐out procedure near and at grain boundaries of ZB and ZTB compositions similar to the method reported by Guo et al Excised tips were sharpened though annular milling with a Ga ion beam at 30 keV followed by a 5‐keV cleaning step to remove surface damage resulting from the sharpening process. Prepared specimens were maintained at 40 K and field‐evaporated in a Local Electrode Atom Probe 5000XS (CAMECA) assisted by a 355‐nm‐wavelength ultraviolet laser pulsing at 400 pJ with a dynamic pulse frequency between 300 and 600 kHz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%