2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2007.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of PIV interrogation area on turbulent statistics up to 4th order moments in smooth and rough wall turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Near the roughness, u u u increases slightly with decreasing resolution and distance from the wall, reaching a maximum difference of ∼15 %. Both trends are consistent with recent observations by Shah, Agelinchaab & Tachie (2008). The present trends also suggest that it is likely that even our present high resolution is still insufficient to capture all the relevant energetic small-scale turbulent motions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Near the roughness, u u u increases slightly with decreasing resolution and distance from the wall, reaching a maximum difference of ∼15 %. Both trends are consistent with recent observations by Shah, Agelinchaab & Tachie (2008). The present trends also suggest that it is likely that even our present high resolution is still insufficient to capture all the relevant energetic small-scale turbulent motions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The limited resolution affects the near-wall trends, but not those in the outer layer, consistent with prior studies (e.g. Ligrani & Moffat 1986;Shah, Agelinchaab & Tachie 2008). Figures 8 and 9 indicate that all the locally normalized stresses in the FPG boundary layer are much weaker than those in ZPG conditions, in agreement with previous …”
Section: Results: Mean Flow and Turbulence Statisticssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They concluded that the hypothesis can be contradicted in channels roughened on one side only, due to the asymmetry in the boundary conditions, while it holds in symmetric channels. More recently, Shah et al (2008) compared the effects of twodimensional (transverse square bars) and three-dimensional (wire mesh) roughness, through the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique. The authors found that wire mesh (in the transitional regime) effects are confined to the buffer region, while the rib roughness (in fully rough regime) effects extend to the entire boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%