Influence of principals’ leadership styles on students’ academic performance in secondary schools in Awendo sub-county, Kenya

Abstract

Studies conducted in USA, Dubai, South Africa, Nigeria, Uganda, central region of Kenya and some part of Nyanza region have revealed that principals' leadership styles influence performance in schools. Leadership style was found to contribute 32.8% to the students' performance in Kinangop. However, there was no information about the influence principals' leadership style has had on the students' academic performance. Awendo sub-county performed below average with a mean of 4.9 for the period 2012 to 2016 yet in the same region Uriri sub-county had a mean of 6.5 and Rongo sub-county 5.8. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to establish the influence of the principals' leadership styles on secondary students' academic performance in Awendo sub-county. The objectives of the study were to: determine the influence of principals' democratic leadership style on students' performance; establish the influence of principals' autocratic leadership style on the students' performance; and to establish the influence of principals' laissez faire leadership styles on students' academic performance. A conceptual framework was used to show the interplay regarding the independent variable, which is leadership styles and that of the dependent variable, which is students' academic performance. The research employed descriptive survey and correlational designs to obtain information. The study population consisted of 35 principals, 340 teachers and 1400 form four students of 2015. Saturated sampling method was used to obtain 30 principals as the remaining 5 were used for piloting. Simple random sampling was used to sample 186 teachers and 301 students from the 30 sampled schools. Data was collected using questionnaire, interview schedules, document analysis and focus group discussions. Face and content validity of the instruments were determined by experts in educational administration. The reliability was tested using test-retest method and a Pearson's r of 0.86 for Principals' questionnaire obtained. Quantitative data was analyzed using frequency count, mean, percentage, correlation and simple linear regression. Qualitative data was transcribed, analyzed and used for triangulation. Leadership styles were measured using a rating scale adopted from Donclark Questionnaire Model for attributes of democratic, autocratic and laissez faire styles whilst students' performance was measured by the school mean score. The study established that democratic leadership accounted for 37.4% of variation in students' academic performance as signified by adjusted R square 0.374. Autocratic leadership accounted for 43.8% of variation in students' academic performance and Laissez faire leadership style accounted for 15.7% of variation in students' academic performance. Principals are encouraged to balance the use both democratic and autocratic styles but avoid Laissez faire style. The study is significant to stakeholders in education in assisting principals to practice leadership styles that would enhance students' academic performance in secondary...

The Influence of Headmaster‘s L leadership of instruction Style and Educator’s Performance on Students’ Academic Achievements

“…Those results prove the theories that the principal's leadership style and teachers' performance have important correlation. This relevant with previous study is important to stakeholders in education in helping headmaster's to implement leadership styles that will increase learners' educational achievement in junior high school [19].…”

The Perceptions of Students and Principals on the Improvement of Students' Achievements by the Managerial and Transformational Leadership Styles

“…Katewa and Heystek (2019) showed that school principals use managerial leadership together with instructional leadership to collaborate and share with teachers; and Valentine and Prater (2011), as well as Maqbool et al (2017) indicate that principal leadership behaviors promoting instructional and curriculum improvement were linked to achievement. Oyugi and Gogo (2019) established that democratic leadership accounted for 37.4% of the variation in students' academic performance, autocratic leadership accounted for 43.8% of the variation in students' academic performance and Laissez-faire leadership style accounted for 15.7% of the variation in students' academic performance; meanwhile, Khan et al (2020) exposes a substantial positive effect of managerial leadership style on innovative behaviors.…”

Kiai Interpersonal Managerial: Henry Mintzberg Perspective

“…Leadership means as someone who leads an organization or institution and is involved in it (Hidayat, 2011). In the context of its function, in terms (Mulyasa, 2009), it asserts that: leadership (Lensufiie, 2010) as a process of influencing the activities (Oyugi & Gogo, 2019) of a person or group as the ability to mobilize (Mulyasa, 2009), general (Qomar, 2007), the behavior of an individual (Yukl, 1998), the ability to lead, control, influence, motivate, invite, direct, advise, guide, command, order, forbid, and even punish (if necessary), and foster subordinates." In an interactional manner, Rost (1993); Uhl-Bien, Riggio, Lowe, & Carsten (2014) define leadership as a mutually influential relationship between leaders and followers (subordinates) who desire real change that reflects a common goal.…”