2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of probe dynamic characteristics on the scanning speed for white light interference based AFM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The plunge cutting produced a taper groove as shown in Figure 8, which was measured using a white light interferometer [36,37]. Distinct difference between ductile-cut and brittle-cut surfaces can be observed.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plunge cutting produced a taper groove as shown in Figure 8, which was measured using a white light interferometer [36,37]. Distinct difference between ductile-cut and brittle-cut surfaces can be observed.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it needs much iteration in dealing with parameter identification of industrial robots since there are more than 20 dimensions in the optimization model. BPNN can improve the convergence ability of PSO [17,18]. Inspired by this fact, this paper proposes a kinematic parameteridentification method based on BPNN-PSO, which can greatly improve the convergence speed of the PSO algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercially available surface profile measurement instruments, such as scanning electron microscopes (SEMs), optical profilers, and atomic force microscopes (AFMs), encounter unsolvable difficulties in the surface profile measurement of microstructures [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For instance, SEMs can carry out fast measurements with a high horizontal resolution of up to nanometers [17,18,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the measurement of microstructures with a slope of 45-90°, the measurement result has large errors in the area with a sharp surface slope because of the effect of light reflection. On the other hand, AFMs have extremely high spatial resolutions both in the horizontal and vertical directions and are usually employed for imaging nanoscale surfaces [19][20][21]25]. However, its measurement ranges in the horizontal and vertical directions are limited to several microns, and therefore, it cannot effectively measure the surface profiles of microstructures with sizes ranging from several microns to several hundred microns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%