2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(2011) , the only author reporting ethnicity, had 6% of Hispanic women among their subjects, against most Hispanic women in our study, which was not registered, for demographic reasons, but expected. In a recent systematic review, performed by Humphries et al (2016) , the authors concluded that there are significant disparities in pregnancy and live birth rates after ART by ethnicity; however, most available studies are limited by sample size, selection bias (different definitions of race and ethnicity), extensive missing data and inadequate adjustment for confounding variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2011) , the only author reporting ethnicity, had 6% of Hispanic women among their subjects, against most Hispanic women in our study, which was not registered, for demographic reasons, but expected. In a recent systematic review, performed by Humphries et al (2016) , the authors concluded that there are significant disparities in pregnancy and live birth rates after ART by ethnicity; however, most available studies are limited by sample size, selection bias (different definitions of race and ethnicity), extensive missing data and inadequate adjustment for confounding variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following independent variables were included in each model: age 19 , race 20 , ethnicity 21 , education 22 , marital status, BMI 23 , current or recent smoker 24 , menstrual regularity, contraceptive use, history of PCOS 25 , primary infertility, importance of post-surgical pregnancy, and surgical procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Poisson mixed model with robust error variance with a person-level random intercept was used to test and estimate associations between preoperative history of infertility and nulliparity with early conception with a person-level random intercept. Analysis was repeated controlling for the following potential preoperative confounders: age [11,21] , race [22] , ethnicity [23] , education [24] , marital status [11] , BMI [25] , current or recent smoker [26] , menstrual regularity, any contraceptive use, history of PCOS [27] , and surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%