2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of radiation damage on krypton diffusion in silicon carbide

Abstract: Diffusion of krypton in poly and single crystalline silicon carbide is investigated and compared with the previously obtained results for xenon, which pointed to a different diffusion mechanism than observed for chemically active elements. For this purpose 360 keV krypton ions were implanted in commercial 6H-SiC and CVD-SiC wafers at room temperature, 350 °C and 600 °C. Width broadening of the implantation profiles and krypton retention during isochronal and isothermal annealing up to temperatures of 1400 °C w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kr implantation into SiC at room temperature amorphized the SiC up to a depth of 186 nm. This is in agreement with the published RBS combined with channelling result of Kr (360 KeV) implanted into 6H-SiC at room temperature [11]. SHI irradiation of the Kr implanted SiC caused a reduction of the amorphous layer thickness from 186 to 159 nm.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kr implantation into SiC at room temperature amorphized the SiC up to a depth of 186 nm. This is in agreement with the published RBS combined with channelling result of Kr (360 KeV) implanted into 6H-SiC at room temperature [11]. SHI irradiation of the Kr implanted SiC caused a reduction of the amorphous layer thickness from 186 to 159 nm.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We have concentrated on aspects such as the diffusion of several fission products implanted in SiC, carbon, and the effects of vacuum annealing on radiation damage introduced by the relatively low energy implantation ions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of amorphization is due to the availability of thermal energy to the displaced atoms that increase the probability of recombination. Similar results have been reported for other implanted FPs surrogates at the same implantation temperature [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%