2019
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1594681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of recirculation over COD and N-NH4 removals from landfill leachate by horizontal flow constructed treatment wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the CW system removed sufficient amount of Ammonia Nitrogen, the mean removal percentages of Ammonia Nitrogen examined in this study for the first cycle i.e., in winter season shown in Table 3 and Figure 9 were 78-92%, 69-89% and 73-90% for Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia and Scirpus validus, respectively. And observed removal performance for the second cycle i.e., in summer season shown in Table 4 and Figure 10 was 78-91%, 70-88% and 73-90% for Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia and Scirpus validus, respectively and exceeds the removal amount examined by the authors (Silvestrini et al, 2019;Cano et al, 2019;Yalcuk and Ugurlu, 2009). The mean values of influent and effluent of Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia and Scirpus validus respectively are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Total Suspended Solidsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Overall, the CW system removed sufficient amount of Ammonia Nitrogen, the mean removal percentages of Ammonia Nitrogen examined in this study for the first cycle i.e., in winter season shown in Table 3 and Figure 9 were 78-92%, 69-89% and 73-90% for Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia and Scirpus validus, respectively. And observed removal performance for the second cycle i.e., in summer season shown in Table 4 and Figure 10 was 78-91%, 70-88% and 73-90% for Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia and Scirpus validus, respectively and exceeds the removal amount examined by the authors (Silvestrini et al, 2019;Cano et al, 2019;Yalcuk and Ugurlu, 2009). The mean values of influent and effluent of Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia and Scirpus validus respectively are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Total Suspended Solidsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Phytoremediation technology is gradually being accepted and used as an effective method for regulating ecological stability and purifying water quality [57]. Phytoremediation techniques purify contaminated soil, water, and groundwater through various pathways, such as phytoextraction, phytofiltration, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, and phytodegradation (Figure 1) [3,45].…”
Section: Phytoremediation Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As alternativas de SbN decentralizadas que podem ser eficazes no controle de escoamentos pluviais e descargas de poluentes são as biorremediações com wetlands construídas (ÁLVAREZ-ROGEL et al, 2020;BAL-DOVI et al, 2021;CANO et al, 2019;CANO et al, 2020;HERNÁNDEZ--CRESPO et al, 2017;JURCZAK et al, 2018;JURCZAK et al, 2019;KOTSIA et al, 2020;LIQUETE et al, 2016;MATAMOROS et al, 2020;MENDON-ÇA;NOLASCO, 2017;YANG et al, 2020), as infraestruturas de biofiltração com parques lineares em margens de rios (IZYDORCZYK et al, 2018;SYMMANK et al, 2020;SZKLAREK et al, 2018), trincheiras de infiltração e biovaletas vegetativas, jardins de chuva, pavimento permeável, telhados verdes e cisternas (EATON, 2018;MEI et al, 2018;RIECHEL et al, 2020;SHE;WEI;YOU, 2021). Os cursos de águas das áreas urbanas de São Paulo são envoltos em galerias pluviais e, dessa forma, as SbN integradas com as infraestruturas de drenagem urbanas são promissoras para mitigar o impacto da urbanização nas redes hídricas.…”
Section: Identificação De áReas Críticas De Poluição Hídri-ca E Alaga...unclassified