Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode

Soares, Paulo Vinícius; Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas; Martins, Luís Roberto Marcondes; Soares, Carlos José

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60006-2

Cited by 184 publications

(217 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

184

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4,11,14 Full amalgam coverage of sufficient strength is capable of restoring form and function and providing adequate fracture resistance in restored teeth. 10,13,26 Clinical observations have indicated high survival rates (from four to 15 years) of amalgam restorations with cusp coverage.…”

Section: Secondary Caries Alpha (α)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reproducing the anatomic form and proximal contacts is difficult and time-consuming. [14][15][16] Thus, a combination of the favorable properties of two direct restorative materials may provide good esthetic results in the labial or occlusal aspects of extended amalgam restorations. [17][18] The combined resin composite-amalgam (hybrid) restoration is not a new technique.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Three-year Clinical Evaluation of Cuspal Coverage with Combined Composite–Amalgam in Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars

Shafıei¹,

Memarpour²,

Doozandeh³

2010

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This clinical study evaluated the clinical performance of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam restorations in endodonticallytreated maxillary premolars over a three-year period. Thirty-six maxillary premolars, each with a Class II cavity in 36 patients ranging in age between 28 and 52 years, were selected after endodontic treatment. After reduction of the buccal and palatal cusps, internal coverage and veneering of the reduced buccal cusp was performed with composite. The remaining cavity and reduced palatal cusp were restored with high-copper amalgam. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and in one-, two-and threeyear recalls with USPHS criteria.Changes in characteristics of the restorations were analyzed with the Cochran Q-test at a significance level of p<0.05. Most of the restorations received an overall score of alpha, except two restorations, which showed a slight discrepancy at the composite-amalgam interface after one year (p>0.05). Four restorations exhibited slight discoloration of the composite veneering after three years (p<0.05). No restoration exhibited fracture after three years. It was concluded that combined composite-amalgam cusp coverage of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars Clinical RelevanceThe results of a three-year follow-up of a small sample of patients suggest that combined composite-amalgam restoration for cuspal coverage is useful as a conservative, one-appointment complementary procedure for endodontically-treated maxillary premolars. Clinical Researchshowed acceptable clinical performance after three years.

show abstract

Section: Secondary Caries Alpha (α)mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-year Clinical Evaluation of Cuspal Coverage with Combined Composite–Amalgam in Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars

Shafıei¹,

Memarpour²,

Doozandeh³

2010

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The primary cause for this difference is the small sample size, whereby only 10 samples were used in each group. However, other studies have used the same sample size of 10 in each group [36,37].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of restorative techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars

Al-Makramani¹,

Razak²,

Yi³

et al. 2013

OJST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yapılan bir çalışmada MOD kavite hazırlanmış premolar dişin kırılma direnci sağlam premolar dişin kırılma direnci ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda MOD kavite preparasyonunun dişin kırılma direncini %33,7 oranında azalttığı belirtilmiştir 16 . Dejak ve ark.…”

Section: Seramik İnleylerin Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörlerunclassified

Serami̇k İnley Restorasyonlar

Öztürk¹

2015

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of ceramic restorations in the posterior region has become widespread due to the development of physical properties of dental ceramics and ceramic-resin cement bonding. Ceramic inlays when used with adhesive technique protect the remaining tooth structure and offer an aesthetics alternative treatment. The aim of this review was to provide general information about indications, contraindications, advantages, disadvantages and factors of affecting the success of the ceramic inlays.

show abstract

Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode

Cited by 184 publications

References 30 publications

Three-year Clinical Evaluation of Cuspal Coverage with Combined Composite–Amalgam in Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars

Three-year Clinical Evaluation of Cuspal Coverage with Combined Composite–Amalgam in Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars

Effect of restorative techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars

Serami̇k İnley Restorasyonlar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About