1989
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910430635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of shear stress on tumor‐cell adhesion to endothelial‐cell extracellular matrix and its modulation by fibronectin

Abstract: The interaction of malignant cells with blood-vessel endothelial cells and their underlying basement membrane is an important step in the development of secondary metastases. We investigated the interactions of highly metastatic human tumor cells, the A-549 adenocarcinoma of the lung, with cultured endothelial cells (EC) and their extracellular matrix (ECM). We studied the adhesion patterns of the A-549 tumor cells to EC and ECM under static and flow conditions. Our results provide evidence that tumor-cell adh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although larger effects might seem more impressive, a moderate difference in adhesiveness may well have significant biological effects (and significant implications for a patient who may or may not progress to metastatic disease). Changes in cancer cell adhesion of this magnitude have previously been described and felt to be important in response to other stimuli by several other authors [Bastida et al, 1989;Haier and Nicolson, 2001;Mine et al, 2003]. Moreover, preexposing SW620 colon cells to such shear stress and turbulence not only increased adhesiveness but also increased Src kinase activity in a durable fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although larger effects might seem more impressive, a moderate difference in adhesiveness may well have significant biological effects (and significant implications for a patient who may or may not progress to metastatic disease). Changes in cancer cell adhesion of this magnitude have previously been described and felt to be important in response to other stimuli by several other authors [Bastida et al, 1989;Haier and Nicolson, 2001;Mine et al, 2003]. Moreover, preexposing SW620 colon cells to such shear stress and turbulence not only increased adhesiveness but also increased Src kinase activity in a durable fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Second, pretreatment of endothelial cells with IL-1 also increases Colo 201 colon cancer cell adhesion under low flow conditions [Yoshida et al, 1999]. Third, laminar flow promotes the adhesion of lung cancer cells [Bastida et al, 1989] and both promotes the adhesion of HT29 colon cancer cells and stabilizes already formed adhesions [Haier and Nicolson, 2000]. Indeed, one report suggests that Src may be involved in the effects of such laminar flow [Haier et al, 2002].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some previous studies have discussed the influence of wall shear stress on cancer cell adhesion, and the tendencies were distinctly different in cell lines with differing metastatic properties (Haier and Nicolson 2001). For example, A-549 lung carcinoma cells (Bastida et al 1989) and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (Moss et al 1999) were found to experience enhanced adhesion to the endothelium due to the added mechanical stimulus of shear stress. In the microchannel used in this study, the wall shear stress was higher on the inner wall than on the outer wall at the bifurcation and the confluence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In former medical researches, adhesion phenomena on blood vessel walls have been investigated in great detail for leukocytes (e.g., Ostermann et al 2002;DiVietro et al 2007), malaria-infected RBCs (e.g., Scholander et al 1996;Beeson et al 2000) and cancer cells (e.g., Miles et al 2008;Glinskii et al 2005;Mine et al 2003;Fidler 2003;Chambers et al 2002). The effect of shear stress on the adhesion of cancer cells has also been thoroughly investigated (Bastida et al 1989;Moss et al 1999;Kitayama et al 2000;Thamilselvan et al 2004;Liang et al 2005Liang et al , 2008. Although these results provide evidence of the complex role of haemodynamic forces in the recruitment of metastatic cancer cells to endothelial cell, they do not provide enough information on how the channel geometry affects the adhesion phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, biochemical interactions between adhesion molecules and their ligands during tumor cell adhesion within circulatory systems appear to be influenced by biophysical factors, such as shear stress caused by fluid flow, and cellular and soluble components of the circulating fluid. [15][16][17] Intravital microscopy technologies have been recently used to investigate metastatic tumor cell adhesion within host organ microcirculation, such as in liver and lung. 10 -14 In these studies contradictory results were reported regarding the type of entrapment (mechanical entrapment 10 -12 versus active cell adhesion 14,18 ) and the requirement of invasion into host organ parenchyma (invasion 10,11,13,18 versus intravascular proliferation 14 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%