2018
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201800156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Size on Melting Thermodynamics of Nanoparticles: Mechanism, Factors, Range, and Degree

Abstract: Particle size plays a crucial role in melting process of nanoparticles, but the mechanism, factors, range, and degree of the size effect are still unclear. Here, the precise equations of the integral melting enthalpy and entropy with radius of nanoparticles are deduced, without any adjustable parameters, and the influencing mechanism and the factors are discussed. Experimentally, the melting of spherical nano‐Au with different radii (0.9–37.4 nm) is taken as a system to research the melting behavior of nanopar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the rPBE-derived ML-FF predicts 250 ± 50 K lower than the ones predicted by the LDA-derived ML-FF, and 180 ± 40 K lower than the ones predicted by the hybrid ML-FF. Interestingly, the predicted by the hybrid ML-FF are <50 K away from the melting temperatures found experimentally via differential scanning calorimetry measurements 39 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On average, the rPBE-derived ML-FF predicts 250 ± 50 K lower than the ones predicted by the LDA-derived ML-FF, and 180 ± 40 K lower than the ones predicted by the hybrid ML-FF. Interestingly, the predicted by the hybrid ML-FF are <50 K away from the melting temperatures found experimentally via differential scanning calorimetry measurements 39 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The reported is averaged over the four (two for NPs with more than 2500 atoms) independent MD simulations carried out for each NP and each ML-FF. For an immediate comparison, we report the experimental melting temperature of bulk FCC Au at atmospheric pressure ( ), and the experimental melting temperatures of Au NPs as a function of the NP size 38 , 39 . For reference, we add the estimates obtained using a classical MD where the interatomic interaction is derived in the second-moment approximation of the tight-binding (TB-SMA) 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns show all peaks match with orthorhombic structure of Bi 2 S 3 NRs (JCPDS 84−0279) and cubic structure of Au NCs (JCPDS 89−3697), respectively (Figure 1e). 39,40 In addition, the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image reveals that Au−Bi 2 S 3 HNSCs are entirely composed of Bi 2 S 3 NRs and Au NCs, where Au NCs uniformly distribute on the surface of Bi 2 S 3 NRs, and the average hydrodynamic diameter of Au−Bi 2 S 3 HNSCs is about 34.5 nm with narrow size distribution (Figure 1b,i). Moreover, the high resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images exhibit that the lattice of Au NCs connect with that of Bi 2 S 3 NRs due to the small lattice mismatch and the atomically smooth interfaces between Bi 2 S 3 NRs and Au NCs (Figure 1c,d and Table S1), indicating that Bi 2 S 3 NRs and Au NCs have a crosslinked to form Schottky heterojunction rather than physically mixed or isolated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the dynamical behavior of the particles, this should result in a lower limit for the true melting temperature. Duan et al found a linear dependence of the melting temperature on the inverse particle diameter for round nanoparticles with a diameter larger than 10 nm. For smaller particles, they found a more severe decrease in the melting temperature, which might be related to sintering as the heat produced via sintering may lead to an underestimation of the effective heat needed to melt the particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%