2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of solidification structure on austenite to martensite transformation in additively manufactured hot-work tool steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the LPBF process with nonequilibrium rapid melting/solidification, it is common for solutes to be redistributed under the Marangoni effect (Figure 8b), resulting in elemental microsegregation. [ 40 ] However, an intermetallic brittle phase (Laves phase) could be formed in LPBF‐printed IN718 alloy due to elemental microsegregation during the solidification process, which could reduce the mechanical properties by the brittle fracture of the phase. [ 41 ] In addition, as the chemical formula of Laves phase is (Ni, Cr, Fe) 2 (Nb, Mo, Ti), the formation of Laves phase could consume elements such as Nb and Ti, reducing the number of strengthening phases (such as γ'‐Ni 3 (Ti, Al), γ″‐Ni 3 Nb) and weakening the solid‐solution strengthening effect of the IN718 alloy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the LPBF process with nonequilibrium rapid melting/solidification, it is common for solutes to be redistributed under the Marangoni effect (Figure 8b), resulting in elemental microsegregation. [ 40 ] However, an intermetallic brittle phase (Laves phase) could be formed in LPBF‐printed IN718 alloy due to elemental microsegregation during the solidification process, which could reduce the mechanical properties by the brittle fracture of the phase. [ 41 ] In addition, as the chemical formula of Laves phase is (Ni, Cr, Fe) 2 (Nb, Mo, Ti), the formation of Laves phase could consume elements such as Nb and Ti, reducing the number of strengthening phases (such as γ'‐Ni 3 (Ti, Al), γ″‐Ni 3 Nb) and weakening the solid‐solution strengthening effect of the IN718 alloy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed, that the primary crystallization of δ-ferrite is not suppressed by the rapid cooling rates present in the PBF-LB/M process for the investigated tool steel [ 7 ]. Although it has to be mentioned, that Chou et al suggested a shift to a primary crystallization of fcc austenite for an H13 hot work tool steel based on calculations of austenite and ferrite dendrite tip temperatures at rapid cooling rates [ 39 ]. The performed Scheil–Gulliver solidification simulation is shown in Figure 13 , wherein the formed phases are plotted against the temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this prediction is consistent with previous observations by Cheruvathur et al [28] in as-built 17-4, where they reported that Fe and Cr are enriched in the dendritic cores. Because these elements have a different solubility in the FCC austenite phase and BCC ferrite phase, this suggests that high temperature δ ferrite may remain upon solidification, through a solidification-velocity dependent competition between austenite and δ ferrite [53]. Recent synchrotron-based high-speed X-ray diffraction experiments that follow the solidification phase transformation sequence from melt to room temperature convincingly demonstrate that the high-temperature δ ferrite, once formed, can sustain to room temperature, albeit at a reduced phase fraction at room temperature than at solidus [54].…”
Section: Density (G/cmmentioning
confidence: 99%