2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of specimen dimensions and strain measurement methods on tensile stress–strain curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, experiments have shown that the measured elongations to failure in tensile testing tend to increase with decreasing gauge length [47,48] and this is because the area of necking constitutes a major fraction of the gauge length in samples with very short gauge lengths so that much of the measured elongation in simple tensile testing is related to flow in the necked region. This suggests, therefore, that it may be unreasonable to make a direct comparison between the total elongations achieved in conventional tensile testing with longer gauge lengths with the results obtained in tensile testing using HPT samples with gauge lengths only of the order of ~1 mm.…”
Section: Significance Of Using Miniature Configurations In the Testinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, experiments have shown that the measured elongations to failure in tensile testing tend to increase with decreasing gauge length [47,48] and this is because the area of necking constitutes a major fraction of the gauge length in samples with very short gauge lengths so that much of the measured elongation in simple tensile testing is related to flow in the necked region. This suggests, therefore, that it may be unreasonable to make a direct comparison between the total elongations achieved in conventional tensile testing with longer gauge lengths with the results obtained in tensile testing using HPT samples with gauge lengths only of the order of ~1 mm.…”
Section: Significance Of Using Miniature Configurations In the Testinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method used to produce miniature tensile specimens is wire electro discharge machining ('wire EDM') [1,7,8,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17] (note that one study used water jet cutting [18]). The advantage of EDM over traditional machining processes is that it can produce the small work piece accurately and to close tolerances with very little wasted material.…”
Section: Tensile Testing Of Miniature Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to avoid that the boundary effects of the end shoulders influence the response of the test section, these ratios can be adopted for miniature tensile test specimens. In studies [17,19] the importance of some of these ratios in miniature tensile test specimens is investigated. The consensus is that an important ratio is G/W and the best results are obtained when adhering to a ratio of 4, just as the standard prescribes for traditional specimens.…”
Section: Tensile Testing Of Miniature Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al (2009) discussed the limitations and issues in correctly interpreting micro tensile experiments. This work (GPa) 57 ± 1 5 7 ± 1 5 2 ± 3 5 7 ± 1 Elongation (%) 30 ± 3 2 6 ± 2 2 7 ± 2 2 5 ± 3 Fig.…”
Section: Sintering and Micro-tensile Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%