2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface morphology and nano-structure on hydrophobicity: A molecular dynamics approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the contact line is divided into much smaller lines, viz., the second level of hierarchy, the related contact angle θ 2 r is distinctively different from θ 1 r of the first level of hierarchy as shown in Figure 5c. These phenomena will be kept on until a homogeneous wetting interface achieved when reaching a level n. Consequently, the contact angle either increases or decreases by adding multiple length scales of roughness at all smaller levels depending on the pinned fraction of each level of hierarchy, which is critical for designing surfaces with various adhesion [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Cassie-baxter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the contact line is divided into much smaller lines, viz., the second level of hierarchy, the related contact angle θ 2 r is distinctively different from θ 1 r of the first level of hierarchy as shown in Figure 5c. These phenomena will be kept on until a homogeneous wetting interface achieved when reaching a level n. Consequently, the contact angle either increases or decreases by adding multiple length scales of roughness at all smaller levels depending on the pinned fraction of each level of hierarchy, which is critical for designing surfaces with various adhesion [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Cassie-baxter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The droplet contact angle, surface morphology, and droplet size remain important for droplet mobility, and molecular dynamic modeling reveals that surface structures similar to gecko feet skin and lotus leaves appear to be more hydrophobic than other textured surfaces. 19 The model and experimental studies are further extended to include droplet motion over hydrophobic surfaces besides interfacial adhesion. In general, the influence of gravitational and interfacial adhesion remains the major contributor to the droplet kinematic properties such as velocity and acceleration.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, model studies incorporating molecular dynamics provide useful information for droplet interfacial adhesion over hydrophobic surfaces . The droplet contact angle, surface morphology, and droplet size remain important for droplet mobility, and molecular dynamic modeling reveals that surface structures similar to gecko feet skin and lotus leaves appear to be more hydrophobic than other textured surfaces . The model and experimental studies are further extended to include droplet motion over hydrophobic surfaces besides interfacial adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-periodic boundary conditions were utilized during the simulation, so that the interaction between atom from the top of PP model and atom at the bottom of substrate layer can be efficiently avoided. The contact angle of polymer droplet on the metal surface was measured by geometric method [ 23 , 30 ], drawing a circle around the droplet and then a tangent line to the solid-liquid interface by using the AutoCAD software (Autodesk Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). The contact angle of each image is analyzed four times to obtain the mean value and standard deviation of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%