2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface properties and bulk viscosity on bubble size prediction during foaming operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the correlation that we have drawn above agrees with results from other studies using pair bubbles (Orvalho et al, 2015) or measuring bubble size distribution (De Preval et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of the Solution Viscosity On The Drainage And Stabilisupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In fact, the correlation that we have drawn above agrees with results from other studies using pair bubbles (Orvalho et al, 2015) or measuring bubble size distribution (De Preval et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of the Solution Viscosity On The Drainage And Stabilisupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The higher the rotor speed, the smaller the bubbles. This phenomenon has previously been described by numerous authors [4,[24][25][26][27]. High rotor speeds generate larger shear strains, which favor the splitting of bubbles, which were consequently smaller at higher rotor speeds.…”
Section: From Surface Properties To Foam Structurementioning
confidence: 67%
“…For very high composite foams (GF‐70 and GF‐80) this phenomenon becomes significant due to the very low workability of the composite synthesis slurry. This promotes the bubble break‐up caused by the increased viscous force acting on the growing bubbles and also hinders the coalescence phenomena due to drainage of the film at the interface that requires more time . Furthermore, during the foaming evolution, the glass‐siloxane slurry progressively becomes denser due to the occurring crosslinking reaction that favors gas cells shrinkage .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This promotes the bubble break-up caused by the increased viscous force acting on the growing bubbles and also hinders the coalescence phenomena due to drainage of the film at the interface that requires more time. 45 Furthermore, during the foaming evolution, the glass-siloxane slurry progressively becomes denser due to the occurring crosslinking reaction that favors gas cells shrinkage. 46 Moreover, the presence of glass powder in the siloxane-based slurry could influence the foaming kinetics due to chemical interaction between constituents.…”
Section: Foam Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%