2012
DOI: 10.1049/mnl.2012.0683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface roughness on wet adhesion of biomimetic adhesive pads with planar microstructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plastic transition of GSMP at the temperature above T g generates negligible recovery force, ensuring the reliable contact on various surface. In contrast, the hyperelasticity of the widely used PDMS, which has an elastic modulus of ≈2 MPa similar to our GSMP, hinders the intimate contact with rough surfaces due to the elastic recovery force . As a result, the GSMP pillar top showed a faithful replica of the substrate surface after the detachment (Figure S7d, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plastic transition of GSMP at the temperature above T g generates negligible recovery force, ensuring the reliable contact on various surface. In contrast, the hyperelasticity of the widely used PDMS, which has an elastic modulus of ≈2 MPa similar to our GSMP, hinders the intimate contact with rough surfaces due to the elastic recovery force . As a result, the GSMP pillar top showed a faithful replica of the substrate surface after the detachment (Figure S7d, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The combination of high contact possibility and the large SAR therefore generates good contacts on rough surfaces, showing better adhesion than that on smooth surfaces. This kind of high adhesion is difficult to achieve in conventional micropillar arrays (such as PDMS) that are difficult to change the shape in order to follow the topography of roughness . When the Sz of substrate is larger than the pillar height, for instance the surfaces with Sq of 3.78 and 4.3 µm, the contact possibility drops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the preparation of adhesion surfaces inspired by tree frog toe pads can be divided into two categories, bottom‐up (e.g. photolithography [13, 29–35, 37, 38, 43–50, 55] and etching [52–54, 56]) and top‐down (e.g. 3D printing [51] and embossing [36–38, 49]) approaches.…”
Section: Artificial Wet Adhesive Surfaces Inspired By Tree Frogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously [17], the tests were started while the samples were still floating in DI water, but here the tests were started after the DI water around the fiber samples was evaporated. The main purpose of this extra step is to decrease the wet adhesive force [22] by avoiding the water bridge between the fiber and the grippers. Humidity and temperature values were set manually via the control modules.…”
Section: B Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%