2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.07.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface roughness on the initial formation of biofilm

Abstract: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints -eprint.ncl.ac.uk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to morphology surface observations done by SEM in Figure 3.a and 3.b, it is possible to observe the differences in the surface between LDPE with and without thermal treatment; after the modification, a micro roughness was achieved in m-LDPE (3.b), it favors the growth and development of biofilm observed in 3.c. This finding is corroborated by Ammar and Oh [13,14], who noted a better biofilm adherence in roughness surface than smooth surfaces. Also, the observations in the other materials 3(d) and 3(f) PET and HDPE respectively without biofilm, and 3(e) and 3(g) with biofilm, show that there is not too much biofilm formation.…”
Section: Biomass Growingsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to morphology surface observations done by SEM in Figure 3.a and 3.b, it is possible to observe the differences in the surface between LDPE with and without thermal treatment; after the modification, a micro roughness was achieved in m-LDPE (3.b), it favors the growth and development of biofilm observed in 3.c. This finding is corroborated by Ammar and Oh [13,14], who noted a better biofilm adherence in roughness surface than smooth surfaces. Also, the observations in the other materials 3(d) and 3(f) PET and HDPE respectively without biofilm, and 3(e) and 3(g) with biofilm, show that there is not too much biofilm formation.…”
Section: Biomass Growingsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It could be thermally modified to get a heavier material as well as to improve the surface characteristics. The treatment favor the attachment and remaining of biofilm on the materials [10,13,14]. The thermal treatment consisted in maintaining the LDPE to exactly 105 °C for 15 minutes in a stove.…”
Section: Modification Of Ldpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is well known that biofilms are more virulent than planktonic cells, there are evidences of convergence between electroactivity and virulence, which open novel possibility in biofilm control and biomedical applications . Surface structure determine initial biofilm attachment, in which biofilm formation is enhanced by nano‐ and micro‐ roughness modifications. However, large microstructures increase diffusional limitations for the transport of nutrient and redox mediator from bulk solution in the biofilms, thus the cell attachment and EET rate does not correlate linearly with the microstructure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we have assumed that the films are abiotic. However, the surface roughness of microaggregates can be expected to provide an ideal niche for microbiological colonization by facilitating cell attachment and protecting against shear stresses imposed during drainage (Ammar et al, 2015). Rough elements extending from the surface of the aggregates mimic mountain‐valley topography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%