2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1391-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surgical approach on heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty – is minimal invasive better? A case control study

Abstract: BackgroundHeterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA).Recently, the trend is to operate THA minimally invasive being less traumatic than standard approaches and promising a faster return to activity. The purpose of the study was to investigate if minimal invasive surgery (MIS), leads also to less HO after THA.MethodsThis retrospective study included 134 consecutive patients undergoing THA. In 42 (31.3%) patients a standard modified anterolateral (STD-Watson-Jon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
45
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…HO development following ABMS THA surgery was 86/233, or 36.9%, which is comparable to studies of direct anterior [16] and posterior THA [17], and lower than the prevalence with a direct lateral approach with (Liverpool) [18] and without (Hardinge-Bauer) [19] bone attachment. Our results demonstrate higher rates of HO compared with two other reports of the ABMS technique [20,21], and we are unsure of the reason for these differences. It is fair to say, however, that there is significant variation in the reported incidence of HO in the literature; and this is likely related to small study sizes, variations in the methodology of measurement, differing implant geometries, and confounding patient risk factors, to name some examples.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…HO development following ABMS THA surgery was 86/233, or 36.9%, which is comparable to studies of direct anterior [16] and posterior THA [17], and lower than the prevalence with a direct lateral approach with (Liverpool) [18] and without (Hardinge-Bauer) [19] bone attachment. Our results demonstrate higher rates of HO compared with two other reports of the ABMS technique [20,21], and we are unsure of the reason for these differences. It is fair to say, however, that there is significant variation in the reported incidence of HO in the literature; and this is likely related to small study sizes, variations in the methodology of measurement, differing implant geometries, and confounding patient risk factors, to name some examples.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Means to prevent or reduce HO have been explored and include pre-operative [3] and post-operative irradiation [4] and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [5, 6]. Rate and degree of HO after THA were shown to be affected by patient gender [7], surgical approach [8, 9] as well as type of surgery [10]. Moreover, African-American ethnicity has been shown to be an independent risk factor for HO formation after THA [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is particularly apparent in terms of HO. According to the studies comparing the most common approaches, the WJ approach seems to be strongly predisposing patients to ossification [15,19]. According to Newman et al [20], the HO rate after surgery using the anterior MIS approach is 24.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterotopic ossification is believed to be a result of osteoinductive growth factors released due to the trauma of soft tissues [11]. The risk of ossification is estimated at 24% to as high as 32% [12]. Prophylaxis options include selective and non-selective non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%