believe sexism in advertisements is revealed not only through overt, easily recognizable content, such as scantily clad women or women in stereotypical roles, but also through less obvious, latent content that may only become apparent through deconstruction of the ads (e.g., a woman seated next to a standing man; eye makeup that may be seen as resembling a bruise; a woman's legs shown without the rest of her body). Furthermore, these experts claim the less obvious forms of sexism perpetuate stereotypes of women, women's inferior status, and even acceptance of abuse and sexual assault of women. Yet, despite the widespread acceptance by experts, there is no evidence that the public considers the latent content to be sexist, nor is there any evidence that the public is affected by these images. Unlike ads containing obvious sexism, whose effects are well established (e.g., American Psychological Association [APA], 2007;Ward & Harrison, 2005), there has been no research into the presumed effects of latent sexism in advertisements. Therefore, this research was designed to determine whether latent sexism in print ads (i.e., content considered sexist by experts, but not identified as sexist by laypersons) promotes acceptance of sexual assault.The notion that ads convey meaning about gender without viewers' awareness is not new. In his influential Gender Advertisements, Goffman (1979) argued that advertisements symbolically reflect social-cultural constructions of gender through displays of posture, positioning, facial expressions, and social roles: Sitting at a man's feet (ritualized subordination), gazing off absently (licensed withdrawal), or gently caressing an object (feminine touch) all demonstrate women's inferior status. According to Goffman, however, we fail to recognize the sexism in these images precisely because they reflect our unexamined assumptions about gender. Nonetheless, these gender displays allegedly perpetuate sexist stereotypes. Despite the complete lack of empirical evidence showing that these images promote sexist beliefs or attitudes, Goffman's analysis is widely accepted by scholars, 769755S GOXXX10.