2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02153.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temporal fluctuations in seed abundance on the foraging behaviour of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) in the central Monte desert, Argentina

Abstract: The simultaneous study of the temporal dynamics of foraging behaviour, diet and seed abundance is essential to assess the way in which resources affect the behaviour and ecology of harvester ants. Here, we evaluate how fluctuations in grass seed abundance during three consecutive growing seasons influenced the foraging behaviour and diet of the harvester ants Pogonomyrmex rastratus, P. mendozanus and P. inermis in the central Monte desert, Argentina. Seed abundance of the most consumed grasses varied greatly t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
44
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(155 reference statements)
2
44
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased foraging activity observed in D. quadriceps when more food is available also occurs in other ant species, in both carnivores, such as Gnamptogenys moelleri (Cogni & Oliveira 2004), Ophthalmopone berthoudi (Peeters & Crewe 1987) and Odontomachus chelifer (Raimundo et al 2009), and seed collectors, such as Pogonomyrmex rastratus, P. inermis and P. mendozanus (Pol et al 2011). These results corroborate the idea that ants adjust their activity according to food availability in the ecosystem, decreasing foraging when little food is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The increased foraging activity observed in D. quadriceps when more food is available also occurs in other ant species, in both carnivores, such as Gnamptogenys moelleri (Cogni & Oliveira 2004), Ophthalmopone berthoudi (Peeters & Crewe 1987) and Odontomachus chelifer (Raimundo et al 2009), and seed collectors, such as Pogonomyrmex rastratus, P. inermis and P. mendozanus (Pol et al 2011). These results corroborate the idea that ants adjust their activity according to food availability in the ecosystem, decreasing foraging when little food is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…On the basis of these results, our study does not completely agree with the optimal foraging theory (OFT) that predicts wide-range diets in low productive environments, as compared to limitedrange diets in high productive environments [2]. Although that theory has been tested in different cases [14,26,27], evidence for granivory systems are limited [28], and it seems that the behavioral peculiarities of ants related to patterns of foraging for resources, make them to perform somehow away from the predictions of OFT [29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The other species that were found in the four samples had highest abundance in the months of rainy season (January and October). This results may be related to the foraging strategy of each species (PORTER;TSCHINKEL, 1987), to the physical barrier imposed by rain, to the efficiency of the pitfall trap during the rainy months, and to the variation of available resources (NUNES et al, 2011). According to Dos Santos et al, (2012), in the Cerrado biome, during the months with lowest precipitation, the availability and quality of food fall sharply, influencing populations directly, including some ant species (see COGNI;OLIVEIRA, 2004;YAMAMOTO;DEL-CLARO 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant resource consumers, including ants, track this production in space and time, adjusting their foraging activities with food availability (e.g. CARROLL; JANZEN, 1973;POL et al, 2011;BELCHIOR et al, 2012). In the Brazilian savannah (Cerrado), precipitation is seasonally discontinuous and yields high temporal heterogeneity in food production, primarily of vegetal origins (FRANCO, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%