2020
DOI: 10.3390/polym12081844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Architecture of Soft Polymer-Functionalized Polymer Nanoparticles on Their Dynamics in Suspension

Abstract: The behavior of nanogels in suspension can be dramatically affected by the grafting of a canopy of end-tethered polymer chains. The architecture of the interfacial layer, defined by the grafting density and length of the polymer chains, is a crucial parameter in defining the conformation and influencing the dynamics of the grafted chains. However, the influence of this architecture when the core substrate is itself soft and mobile is complex; the dynamics of the core influences the dynamics of the tethered cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of λ SF = 3.0 was selected because it was at or above c * in all cases. The T 1 relaxation time probes the speed at which energy is transferred from an excited nucleus to the surrounding environment and has been used as a metric to assess the local, molecular mobility of tethered and untethered polymers. ,,, In contrast to the PFG-NMR results, which measured the polymer motions on a millisecond timescale, the T 1 relaxation time is able to capture the dynamics of the polymers on a nanosecond timescale . For the temperature selected for this particular experiment (i.e., 25 °C), it has been reported that the T 1 relaxation time of tethered polymers is typically shorter than that of free polymers because of the reduced polymer mobility resulting from conformational confinement of tethered polymers when compared to untethered polymers. ,, Similar results were obtained from our 13 C NMR studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of λ SF = 3.0 was selected because it was at or above c * in all cases. The T 1 relaxation time probes the speed at which energy is transferred from an excited nucleus to the surrounding environment and has been used as a metric to assess the local, molecular mobility of tethered and untethered polymers. ,,, In contrast to the PFG-NMR results, which measured the polymer motions on a millisecond timescale, the T 1 relaxation time is able to capture the dynamics of the polymers on a nanosecond timescale . For the temperature selected for this particular experiment (i.e., 25 °C), it has been reported that the T 1 relaxation time of tethered polymers is typically shorter than that of free polymers because of the reduced polymer mobility resulting from conformational confinement of tethered polymers when compared to untethered polymers. ,, Similar results were obtained from our 13 C NMR studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR T 1 relaxation time measures the longitudinal relaxation of an excited nucleus and depends upon the local and global surroundings. Throughout the literature, the T 1 relaxation time has been used to assess polymer mobility in various environments, where grafted polymers have been shown to possess shorter relaxation times than untethered polymers as a result of steric confinement. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a set of methods could be used in parallel, such as direct (TEM, SEM) and indirect (probe adsorption, SAXS, NMR cryoporometry, DSC thermoporometry, etc.) methods [ 9 , 28 , 31 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 111 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 ]. More accurate results can be obtained if several methods are used in parallel (e.g., SAXS and adsorption).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a set of methods could be used in parallel, such as direct (TEM, SEM) and indirect (probe adsorption, SAXS, NMR cryoporometry, DSC thermoporometry, etc.) methods [9,28,31,[54][55][56][64][65][66][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]111,[114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130]. More accurate results can be obtained if several methods are used in parallel (e.g., SAXS and adsorption).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%