2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.180406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the interface structure on the bias dependence of tunneling magnetoresistance

Abstract: Ab initio calculations for the tunneling magnetoresistance ͑TMR͒ in planar Fe/ MgO / Fe junctions are presented. The electronic and magnetic structure of the junctions are calculated self-consistently in the framework of density functional theory. The bias dependence of the tunneling conductance and the magnetoresistance is calculated in the limit of coherent tunneling. Positive and negative TMR ratios are obtained as a function of interface structure and even a sign reversal of TMR as a function of bias was f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
83
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
83
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since structural information of Fe/MgO/Fe MTJs with embedded ultrathin Cr and Co spacers are not reported so far, we resort to a geometry of planar Fe(001)/MgO/Fe(001) junctions which has been determined experimentally by surface x-ray diffraction analyses 30,31 . This structure has been used in previous theoretical studies 16,32 . In detail, a supercell geometry with six MgO layers sandwiched by 20 Fe layers was used to compute self-consistently the atomic potentials.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since structural information of Fe/MgO/Fe MTJs with embedded ultrathin Cr and Co spacers are not reported so far, we resort to a geometry of planar Fe(001)/MgO/Fe(001) junctions which has been determined experimentally by surface x-ray diffraction analyses 30,31 . This structure has been used in previous theoretical studies 16,32 . In detail, a supercell geometry with six MgO layers sandwiched by 20 Fe layers was used to compute self-consistently the atomic potentials.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14] Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this behavior, including inelastic spinflip scattering processes by interfacial magnon excitations, 15,16 spin-independent two-step elastic tunneling via defect states in the insulating barrier, 17 voltage-dependent density of states at the Fermi level, 18 and the electronic structure of the FM electrodes. 12,13,19,20 While in MTJ structures the relative orientation of magnetizations affects the flow of spin-polarized current, Slonczewski 21 and Berger 22 independently predicted a reverse effect. Namely, the flow of spin-polarized current in noncollinear MTJ can transfer spin angular momentum from the carriers to the ferromagnet and alter the orientation of the corresponding magnetization at sufficiently high current density, even in the absence of an applied field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,18,19 Theoretical calculations claimed that the transport properties can change drastically if such an FeO layer is present at the Fe/MgO interface. 11,20,21 Several different geometries for the Fe/MgO interface have been proposed theoretically, based on relaxing ͓Fe͔ n / ͓MgO͔ m supercells, consisting of n Fe and m MgO monolayers ͑MLs͒ subject to various constraints. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%