2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1525-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population

Abstract: The increased maternal morbidity in elective cesarean section included puerperal febrile morbidity, wound infections as well as breastfeeding problems in the postpartum period. Women should be sufficiently counseled regarding the increased risk of these complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 The results of our study showed that after adjustment for background characteristics, the risk of bleeding complication was more than doubled in the elective caesarean section group and doubled in the emergency caesarean section group. Bodner et al 31 reports similar results from a comparative study between elective caesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk population. Increased maternal morbidity included more frequent blood loss (>500 ml) and puerperal febrile morbidity with a significant increased use of antibiotics, iron supplementation and analgesics, as well as prolonged hospital stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…29,30 The results of our study showed that after adjustment for background characteristics, the risk of bleeding complication was more than doubled in the elective caesarean section group and doubled in the emergency caesarean section group. Bodner et al 31 reports similar results from a comparative study between elective caesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk population. Increased maternal morbidity included more frequent blood loss (>500 ml) and puerperal febrile morbidity with a significant increased use of antibiotics, iron supplementation and analgesics, as well as prolonged hospital stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The classifying diagnoses and reasons with accompanying hospital visit dates were registered with ICD‐10‐AM‐codes. Short‐term adverse health outcomes included jaundice, feeding problems, and hypothermia and often are part of the adaptation of the infant to being outside the uterus 7, 27, 28. The longer‐term adverse health outcomes included asthma, respiratory infections (eg, common cold, pneumonia, bronchitis), gastrointestinal disorders, other infections (eg, sepsis, streptococcus, cystitis), metabolic disorder (eg, hypoglycemia, neonatal diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2, localized adiposity), and eczema, based on the potential effect that mode of birth has on immune‐related diseases 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] For example, studies have reported that children born by cesarean delivery may have increased rates of respiratory illness in their first year of life 5,7,8 and beyond, 9,10 and relationships have also been described with diabetes 11 and child overweight and obesity. 12,13 Notwithstanding these potential adverse associations, children born by cesarean delivery are usually healthy, and it is important to recognize that many factors influence child health other than mode of birth.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%