2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the residual stress on the nanoindentation-evaluated hardness for zirconiumnitride films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have shown that the true contact area has an almost linear relationship with the residual stress and increases with increasing compressive stress, while it decreases with increasing tensile stress. 31,35,37,62 The different variation of true contact area with residual stresses is due to the fact that compressive stresses tend to increase the pile-up amount, thus increasing the true contact area, while tensile stresses gives an opposite effect to decrease the true contact area.…”
Section: Effect On True Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that the true contact area has an almost linear relationship with the residual stress and increases with increasing compressive stress, while it decreases with increasing tensile stress. 31,35,37,62 The different variation of true contact area with residual stresses is due to the fact that compressive stresses tend to increase the pile-up amount, thus increasing the true contact area, while tensile stresses gives an opposite effect to decrease the true contact area.…”
Section: Effect On True Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the tempered glass, the exact Poisson's ratio of the surface region with compressive stress is unknown 4,30 ; thus, we use the reduced modulus, rather than elastic modulus here. Also, note that the Oliver‐Pharr model is based on the projected area ( A c ) calculated from a contact depth ( h c ) which is estimated from h max , P max , and stiffness ( S ) of the P ‐ h curve (as marked in the top panel of Figure 4A as an example) assuming that the material is homogeneous and has no stress and its response is fully elastic; thus, it does not work well for the material with an internal stress gradient 44–46 . Then, the reduced modulus and hardness calculated from the P ‐ h curves of the tempered surfaces must be taken as apparent values predicted from the Oliver‐Pharr model assuming no internal stress, instead of true values which can be obtained only when the real contact area is known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where β was a correction factor, which depends on the indenter geometry. For Berkovich indenter, β was a constant with a value of 1.034 [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%