2016
DOI: 10.1080/09276440.2017.1267524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the silanes on the crosslink density and crosslink structure of silica-filled solution styrene butadiene rubber compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many efforts have been made to improve the interfacial interaction between silica and SSBR and the dispersion of silica in the SSBR matrix. These methods include the modication of silica, 6,7 the addition of silane coupling agents, 4,8,9 and functionalization of the SSBR matrix. [10][11][12][13] Among the above methods, functionalization of the SSBR matrix, which includes end functionalization 10,11 and in-chain functionalization, 12,13 is the method of solving silica dispersion in composites from the perspective of rubber synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts have been made to improve the interfacial interaction between silica and SSBR and the dispersion of silica in the SSBR matrix. These methods include the modication of silica, 6,7 the addition of silane coupling agents, 4,8,9 and functionalization of the SSBR matrix. [10][11][12][13] Among the above methods, functionalization of the SSBR matrix, which includes end functionalization 10,11 and in-chain functionalization, 12,13 is the method of solving silica dispersion in composites from the perspective of rubber synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the contributions of the filler–rubber interaction and chemical crosslink density to the total crosslink density were separated quantitatively. Lee et al conducted swelling tests and used Equations (1) and (2) for vulcanizates filled with silica or carbon black in order to separate the total crosslink density into the filler–rubber interaction and chemical crosslink density [ 21 ]. In addition, a previous study by Kim et al categorized SBR compounds with carbon black and silica as binary fillers into CBBR, SSRN, and CCDS by employing the swelling test as well as Equations (1) and (2), as demonstrated in Figure 2 [ 25 ].…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, vulcanizate structures in compounds using silica as the filler were classified quantitatively according to the network from silica-silane–rubber and the chemical crosslink by sulfur [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In addition, as shown in Figure 1 , there are existing studies on compounds using carbon black and silica as binary fillers that are distinguished based on the chemical crosslink density by sulfur (CCDS), carbon black bound rubber (CBBR) (i.e., the physical crosslink due to carbon black), and silica-silane–rubber network (SSRN) [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples, after removing the organic additives, were stored at room temperature for 24 h in the mixture solution. Subsequently, the sample was removed and dried, and then swollen in toluene for 24 h. Di-and mono-crosslinks were measured using the difference in the sample weight before and after swelling [42,43].…”
Section: Analysis Of Vulcanizate Structure (Swelling Test)mentioning
confidence: 99%