2018
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201800147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Surface Treatment on the Solution Coating of Single‐Crystalline Organic Thin‐Films

Abstract: and others [10,22,23] show high potential to achieve next generation high performance thin films. These techniques rely on the creation of a moving meniscus front, where enhanced evaporation at the tip of the meniscus leads to the precipitation of the organic solute onto the advancing single-crystalline thin film. As it defines meniscus shape, the wetting behavior of the solution on the substrate strongly impacts film formation.Typically, self-assembled monolayers are used to modify the surface energy of subst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the evaporative regime, the coating speed is chosen close to the equilibrium meniscus receding speed governed by solvent evaporation. In previous works on this regime, we defined guidelines to select the optimum coating speed and substrate surface treatment as a function of solvent, organic semiconductor, and substrate temperature. Pursuing further this clarification effort, here, we address the impact of solute concentration c s on the formation of highly crystalline organic thin films by meniscus‐guided coating techniques in the evaporative regime.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the evaporative regime, the coating speed is chosen close to the equilibrium meniscus receding speed governed by solvent evaporation. In previous works on this regime, we defined guidelines to select the optimum coating speed and substrate surface treatment as a function of solvent, organic semiconductor, and substrate temperature. Pursuing further this clarification effort, here, we address the impact of solute concentration c s on the formation of highly crystalline organic thin films by meniscus‐guided coating techniques in the evaporative regime.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These films are typically processed on inert substrates using meniscus‐guided coating techniques such as solution shearing, dip coating, zone casting, and others . These solution coating techniques drag a droplet of solution laterally across a highly lyophilic surface, resulting in a shallow meniscus front at the edge of the receding solution drop. Enhanced solvent evaporation at the edge of this meniscus leads to supersaturation of the solution and precipitation of the organic solute onto the advancing crystalline thin film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding T b and γ values are listed in Table 1 . We paid particular attention to the surface tension difference between substrate and solvent as it will determine the formation of the meniscus‐line and level of supersaturation and thus crystal growth . As shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information, the γ of phenyltrichlorosilane (PTS) treated substrate is 43.35 mN m −1 and it is higher than all the solvents being used (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer curves of the OFETs are shown in Figure . The threshold voltages, I ON / I OFF ratios, subthreshold swing and three methods of calculating mobility: the highest initial mobilities in the saturation regime, μ sat , their corresponding effective mobilities, μ eff, and the mobilities based on the average slope, μ avg‐Vg are listed in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the intrinsic mobility, the method of non‐ V G ‐dependent mobility was also used to analyze whether the mobility approached the intrinsic mobility . When this method was adopted, the highest transistor average effective mobility (μ avg‐vg ) was 30.7 cm 2 V −1 s −1 (Figure S5, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%