2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Thickness and Contact Surface Geometry of Condylar Stem of TMJ Implant on Its Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is referred to as "ANAT". As with previous studies, [9][10][11] there was no contact between the prosthesis and the resected condylar surface. Each prosthesis was made from cobalt chrome alloy (Young's modulus 200 GPa) and was attached to the mandible with 6 screws.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is referred to as "ANAT". As with previous studies, [9][10][11] there was no contact between the prosthesis and the resected condylar surface. Each prosthesis was made from cobalt chrome alloy (Young's modulus 200 GPa) and was attached to the mandible with 6 screws.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Ramos et al 7 found that an anatomically-shaped prosthesis with a thinner section could cause overstrain on the bone; its lower rigidity caused more load to be transferred to the bone proximally than would be the case for the thicker Christensen-type prosthesis. Arabshahi et al 11 also used an incisal bite condition for Christensen-type prostheses of different thicknesses fixed with 3 screws, and compared an anatomical one with flat versions. For their thickest flat version (2.5 mm), the strain on the bone at the top screw was comparable with that for the FLAT version in our study, but in their version that was 1 mm thick it exceeded 3000 strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations