2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of tooth removal on mandibular bone response to mastication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, from a biomechanical perspective, the bone resorption may not be preventable as the original mechanical environment has been considerably compromised and might never be fully replaced. On the other hand, the installation of the FPD can reduce BMD loss when compared with a tooth extraction scenario without FPD treatment (Field et al, 2008(Field et al, , 2010 (Fig. 8c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, from a biomechanical perspective, the bone resorption may not be preventable as the original mechanical environment has been considerably compromised and might never be fully replaced. On the other hand, the installation of the FPD can reduce BMD loss when compared with a tooth extraction scenario without FPD treatment (Field et al, 2008(Field et al, , 2010 (Fig. 8c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…PDL is generally known to respond mechanical loading in a non-linear manner (Toms et al, 2002), but such a response was not employed in this remodelling analysis paper as the mastication loading-induced strains fall in the linear elastic region of the constitutive model (Field et al 2008).…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second premolar, first molar and second molar were occlusally loaded with the forces of 40 N, 80 N and 100 N, respectively, through a surface-tosurface frictional contact with solid food (frictional coefficient f = 0.2). 10,11 Fully bonded interfaces were assumed between the FPD and abutments simulating fixed prosthodontics.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Clinically, bone resorption is often an inevitable consequence following tooth extraction due to local bone disuse and loss of supporting functions. 10,11 Although the resorption may not be eliminated completely, its severity can be reduced by ensuring the prosthesis to transmit sufficient mechanical loadings to the underlying bone in a proper way. 12,13 However, it is unclear what the in vivo biomechanical responses are for either an inlay or onlay bridge treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%