2016
DOI: 10.5721/eujrs20164902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of tree species complexity on discrimination performance of vegetation Indices

Abstract: Performance of different vegetation indices (VIs) in combination with single-and multipleendmember (SEM and MEM) for discriminating Corsican and Scots pines with different ages and Broadleaves tree species is demonstrated by using an airborne hyperspectral data. The analysis is performed in three different complexity levels. The results show by increasing tree species complexity, overall accuracy significantly reduced. An overall accuracy up to 90% is obtained from the first category with the least complexity;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies use vegetation indices that are mathematical functions that combine two or more spectral bands, condensing data in a quantitative numeric manner (Rizzi, 2004). This spectral information contributes to the differentiation and identification of tree species, and are related to some important biophysical properties, such as leaf area index, biomass and vegetation cover (Ahmed, Tian, Zhang, & Ting, 2011;Ghiyamat, Shafri, & Shariff, 2016) and have been used to develop aboveground biomass functions (Chen, Weber, & Gokhale, 2011;Hall, Skakun, Arsenault, & Case, 2006;Ji et al, 2012;Lu, 2006;Muukkonen & Heiskanen, 2007;Tomppo, Nilsson, Rosengren, Aalto, & Kennedy, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies use vegetation indices that are mathematical functions that combine two or more spectral bands, condensing data in a quantitative numeric manner (Rizzi, 2004). This spectral information contributes to the differentiation and identification of tree species, and are related to some important biophysical properties, such as leaf area index, biomass and vegetation cover (Ahmed, Tian, Zhang, & Ting, 2011;Ghiyamat, Shafri, & Shariff, 2016) and have been used to develop aboveground biomass functions (Chen, Weber, & Gokhale, 2011;Hall, Skakun, Arsenault, & Case, 2006;Ji et al, 2012;Lu, 2006;Muukkonen & Heiskanen, 2007;Tomppo, Nilsson, Rosengren, Aalto, & Kennedy, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different narrow-banded hyperspectral vegetation indices were derived from spectral measurements to allow species-level identification of plants [45,54]. These indices were based on the variations in chlorophyll absorption, greenness, water absorption, and other pigments at different wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum.…”
Section: Calculation Of Spectral Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies are based on the variations between spectral signatures of different plant species. However, the potential of hyperspectral indices, as well as red-edge parameters (REPs), has also previously been studied for discriminating between the spectral diversity of plant species [44][45][46] Cho et al [47] evaluated the potential of spectral indices by using leaf and canopy spectra of six different species and found REP, NDVI, and PRI as good indices for the spectral identification of plant species. Similarly, invasive Acacia longifolia (Andrews) Willd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific spectral bands were also used to compute a set of 65 vegetation indices, including the following vegetation categories: Broadband greenness, narrowband greenness, canopy water content, canopy nitrogen, dry or senescent carbon, leaf pigments and light use efficiency. Both feature extraction methods have been shown to be highly effective in research studies of species differentiation [55,[74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Hyperspectral Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%