2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of virus inoculation method and host larval age on productivity of the nucleopolyhedrovirus of the teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera (Cramer)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jun et al (2007) reported that the volume of POBs of SlMNPV harvested on the 5th day of the postinoculation period was significantly lower than that harvested on the 7th day of the post-incubation period which was significantly lower than that harvested after larval death, and a similar trend was observed in biological activity by dosing the fifth instar larvae. To study the influence of virus inoculation method and host larval age on the productivity of the NPV of the teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera (Cramer) was determined by different methods of inoculation (Biji et al 2006).…”
Section: In Vivo Mass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jun et al (2007) reported that the volume of POBs of SlMNPV harvested on the 5th day of the postinoculation period was significantly lower than that harvested on the 7th day of the post-incubation period which was significantly lower than that harvested after larval death, and a similar trend was observed in biological activity by dosing the fifth instar larvae. To study the influence of virus inoculation method and host larval age on the productivity of the NPV of the teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera (Cramer) was determined by different methods of inoculation (Biji et al 2006).…”
Section: In Vivo Mass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplication rate of HpNPV is fairly typical for this type of baculovirus, and it depends on the initial dose rate, the development stage of the larval host and the time post-infection (Fig. 8.15) (Biji et al, 2006). The number of PIBs per larva produced in a field mass production system averaged around 5 × 10 8 at death (Sudheendrakumar et al, 2004).…”
Section: Biological Control Using Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different outcomes depend in part on the life stage at which infection occurs. Virus infections in larvae tend to cause lethality more often than in adults [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Moreover, within the different larval stages there can be variation in the resistance or susceptibility to the viral infection [ 3 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, within the different larval stages there can be variation in the resistance or susceptibility to the viral infection [ 3 , 8 ]. While the use of insect-specific viruses as biocontrol agents provides a target-specific alternative to chemical-based methods and has indeed become common practise in the agricultural field [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], the stage-specific variability in the outcome of infection can be a major challenge [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 12 ]. For example, baculoviruses often cause lethal infections when orally delivered to larvae of Lepidopteran pests, but in many cases, significant mortality is achieved only when the virus is fed to newly hatched or early-instar larvae [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%