2003
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2003.614.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of Different Water-Stress Treatments on Growth, Development and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris. L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the content on soluble sugars and proteins of green bean pods grown in the different substrates did not result in significant differences between them (Table 4). These values can be considered analogous to those formerly recorded with the other green bean varieties (Singer et al 2002;Sánchez-Mata et al 2003;Sanchez et al 2004;Proulx et al 2010;Ramírez et al 2013).…”
Section: Leaf Gas Exchange Photosynthetic Pigments Soluble Sugars supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The evaluation of the content on soluble sugars and proteins of green bean pods grown in the different substrates did not result in significant differences between them (Table 4). These values can be considered analogous to those formerly recorded with the other green bean varieties (Singer et al 2002;Sánchez-Mata et al 2003;Sanchez et al 2004;Proulx et al 2010;Ramírez et al 2013).…”
Section: Leaf Gas Exchange Photosynthetic Pigments Soluble Sugars supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, the application volume of irrigation water based on replacing 80% of evapotranspiration improved the pod parameters and nutritional composition of green beans [14]. Furthermore, inadequate supply of irrigation water to French beans may also increase the fibre content in pods, as indicated by the results of Singer et al [15] obtained after a reduction in the water supply from 100% to 75% or 50% of the field capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Rubisco activity reduction has generally been found under severe WD (Maroco et al 2002;Parry et al 2002;Flexas et al 2006). Alterations in both stomatal and non-stomatal limitations have been shown during WD periods and rewatering (Costa Franca et al 2000;Singer et al 2003;Efeoglu et al 2009). Changes in leaf anatomical parameters, altering CO 2 conductance diffusion components, and thus collaborating with the maintenance of photosynthetic rates even at low stomatal conductance (Chartzoulakis et al 1999) are one of the effects of WD.…”
Section: Research Article Leaf Recovery Responses During Rehydration mentioning
confidence: 99%